Le Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 08:50:08AM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
Hi release heros,
while the bug would be fixed in unstable after a simple rebuild it
concerns the Squeeze release. I prepared a fixed version of the package
(see debdiff).
Hi Andreas, Steffen and release team,
are you sure
Hi again,
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 05:00:27PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
while the bug would be fixed in unstable after a simple rebuild it
concerns the Squeeze release. I prepared a fixed version of the package
(see debdiff).
Hi Andreas, Steffen and release team,
are you sure that
On 01/25/2011 09:46 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi again,
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 05:00:27PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
while the bug would be fixed in unstable after a simple rebuild it
concerns the Squeeze release. I prepared a fixed version of the package
(see debdiff).
Hi Andreas,
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 08:50:08 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi release heros,
while the bug would be fixed in unstable after a simple rebuild it
concerns the Squeeze release. I prepared a fixed version of the package
(see debdiff).
You can't upload to tpu a version lower than what's in
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:12:58 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 08:50:08 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi release heros,
while the bug would be fixed in unstable after a simple rebuild it
concerns the Squeeze release. I prepared a fixed version of the package
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:12:58AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
while the bug would be fixed in unstable after a simple rebuild it
concerns the Squeeze release. I prepared a fixed version of the package
(see debdiff).
You can't upload to tpu a version lower than what's in sid.
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:48:01 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
I might consider uploading to unstable the proposed version (+Debhelper 7)
in any case. This is suboptimal for unstable because R version is higher
there but I might check in my unstable chroot if it at least passes the
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:28:20AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
I might consider uploading to unstable the proposed version (+Debhelper 7)
in any case. This is suboptimal for unstable because R version is higher
there but I might check in my unstable chroot if it at least passes the
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:43:11AM +0100, Steffen Möller wrote:
On 01/25/2011 11:38 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:02:37AM +0100, Steffen Möller wrote:
this is weird. I got a complaint when I ran it on a squeeze system the day
before yesterday.
I then compiled it
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:04:06 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
Just for the sake of interest: The no-no for the Debhelper 5 to 7 bump
is only because you consider the *change* with potential consequences as
to heavy for last minute Squeeze inclusion or is there something else
which makes it a
Package: r-other-mott-happy
Version: 2.1-4+b1
Severity: grave
Tags: squeeze sid
The current -4 package was built with a version of R 2.10 and is hence
incompatible. The current version should not be shipped with squeeze.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
APT prefers unstable
APT
Hi release heros,
while the bug would be fixed in unstable after a simple rebuild it
concerns the Squeeze release. I prepared a fixed version of the package
(see debdiff).
Notes to the debdiff besides fixing (rebuilding against the R version in
Squeeze):
- Updated Standards-Version to keep
12 matches
Mail list logo
