Bug#611456: Why wishlist?

2011-03-21 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 12:56:38PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > Please stop this. The Hurd porters (i.e. we) are responsible for > providing acceptable patches, not the Debian maintainer. Thanks Michael. FWIW the main difference between Hurd and FreeBSD here is in the approach taken to submi

Bug#611456: Why wishlist?

2011-03-20 Thread Michael Banck
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 12:48:08PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > On Sat, 2011-03-19 at 13:14 +, Mark Brown wrote: > > severity 611456 wishlist > > kthxbye > > OK, lets keep is as wishlist as you propose. Will it be hanging around > for another three years as bug #468696? Please stop this.

Bug#611456: Why wishlist?

2011-03-20 Thread Svante Signell
On Sat, 2011-03-19 at 13:14 +, Mark Brown wrote: > severity 611456 wishlist > kthxbye OK, lets keep is as wishlist as you propose. Will it be hanging around for another three years as bug #468696? > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:17:44PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > > Why downgrading this

Bug#611456: Why wishlist?

2011-03-19 Thread Mark Brown
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 02:49:29PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > It fixes a FTBFS bug though, which makes "important" a reasonable > severity for this. It fails to build from source on an architecture it never claimed to support in the first place... > However, we respect your opinion about this

Bug#611456: Why wishlist?

2011-03-19 Thread Michael Banck
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 01:14:22PM +, Mark Brown wrote: > severity 611456 wishlist > kthxbye > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:17:44PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > > Why downgrading this bug report to a wishlist? Due to lack of support > > for multiple cores?? Take a look at the output of x

Bug#611456: Why wishlist?

2011-03-19 Thread Mark Brown
severity 611456 wishlist kthxbye On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:17:44PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > Why downgrading this bug report to a wishlist? Due to lack of support > for multiple cores?? Take a look at the output of x86info for a That's a part of it, yes - you've submitted a partial patch

Bug#611456: Why wishlist?

2011-03-17 Thread Svante Signell
severity 611456 important Why downgrading this bug report to a wishlist? Due to lack of support for multiple cores?? Take a look at the output of x86info for a GNU/Linux box with dual cores, especially the last lines! This bug is important due to the support of a new architecture and a patch and