On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 06:24:41PM +, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
Hi,
Without too much reading, it seems tomb and cryptmount somewhat similar.
The latter is already in the archives and stable. What's the most
important differences (if any)?
I'd say that one of the most important
Hi Bert,
On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 13:03 +0200, berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote:
I'd say that one of the most important difference is the use of the
steghide tool to hide access keys in an image. Also Tomb has some Gtk
integration.
The steghide sounds good!
However there are plenty of
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 12:00:59PM +, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
Hi Bert,
On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 13:03 +0200, berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote:
I'd say that one of the most important difference is the use of the
steghide tool to hide access keys in an image. Also Tomb has some Gtk
Hi Bert,
On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 14:20 +0200, berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 12:00:59PM +, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
You make a point. If I asked for the status of this packaging, it's
because I was willing to stand up for maintaining it if no one was
Hi,
Without too much reading, it seems tomb and cryptmount somewhat similar.
The latter is already in the archives and stable. What's the most
important differences (if any)?
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
5 matches
Mail list logo
