The pre-release drivers fixed my dependency problems, but I can't get
multi-head to work with them. I'm using a single card to drive 2
monitors, and as long as I have a Screen 0 or Screen 1 in either
device section, xorg bombs out saying screen 0 deleted because a
matching config section
Gary Kramlich g...@reaperworld.com writes:
The pre-release drivers fixed my dependency problems, but I can't get
multi-head to work with them. I'm using a single card to drive 2
monitors, and as long as I have a Screen 0 or Screen 1 in either
device section, xorg bombs out saying screen 0
On 02/22/2011 12:32 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
Gary Kramlichg...@reaperworld.com writes:
The pre-release drivers fixed my dependency problems, but I can't get
multi-head to work with them. I'm using a single card to drive 2
monitors, and as long as I have a Screen 0 or Screen 1 in either
Gary Kramlich g...@reaperworld.com writes:
That's pretty much what mine looks like, except that I'm in a disjoint
setup. No xinerama/dualview.
Yeah, I'm the same way. I hate Xinerama.
I'm probably going to have the same problem that you have, then -- I
haven't upgraded this particular
On 02/22/2011 01:31 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
Gary Kramlichg...@reaperworld.com writes:
That's pretty much what mine looks like, except that I'm in a disjoint
setup. No xinerama/dualview.
Yeah, I'm the same way. I hate Xinerama.
I'm probably going to have the same problem that you
On 02/22/2011 01:31 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
Gary Kramlichg...@reaperworld.com writes:
That's pretty much what mine looks like, except that I'm in a disjoint
setup. No xinerama/dualview.
Yeah, I'm the same way. I hate Xinerama.
I'm probably going to have the same problem that you
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 09:36:04 -0600, Gary Kramlich wrote:
The pre-release drivers fixed my dependency problems, but I can't
get multi-head to work with them. I'm using a single card to drive
2 monitors, and as long as I have a Screen 0 or Screen 1 in
either device section, xorg bombs out
On 2011-02-19 00:44, Craig Sanders wrote:
more detail on xorg-video-abi-8.0 vs xorg-video-abi-8
...
not sure if this bug belongs to nvidia-glx or xserver-xorg-core, but the
solution
requires co-ordination between the two packages.
This needs to be fixed in the nvidia packages, the new
On 2011-02-19 00:11, Emil Sedgh wrote:
The nvidia-glx package on 'upcoming experimental' page you linked still
depends on 'xorg-video-abi-8.0' but 'xorg-video-abi-8' is provied by xserver-
xorg-core.
I don't see your problem:
Package: nvidia-glx
Version: 260.19.36-0~anbe1
Architecture: amd64
On 2011-02-17 16:07, Ernesto Domato wrote:
Hi, I was trying to upgrade my unstable/experimental Debian desktop
and found what the subjects says :-)
Trying to upgrade xserver-xorg-core from 2:1.9.4-1 to 2:1.9.4-2 tries
to remove nvidia-glx version 260.19.21-1 since it depends on
On Jumee, Bahman 29, 1389 03:14:53 pm Andreas Beckmann wrote:
A new pre-release of upcoming experimental packages is available at
http://stxxl.ae.cs.uni-frankfurt.de/tmp/262e3a21-dcfc-4852-84b7-44d1cab8ed
e2-n-g-d-exp/
Andreas
Hi Andreas.
The nvidia-glx package on 'upcoming experimental'
more detail on xorg-video-abi-8.0 vs xorg-video-abi-8
xserver-xorg-core 2:1.9.4-1 Provides both of them, but 2:1.9.4-2
Provides only xorg-video-abi-8:
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.9.4-1
Provides: xorg-input-abi-11, xorg-input-abi-11.0, xorg-video-abi-8,
xorg-video-abi-8.0
Package:
Hi, I was trying to upgrade my unstable/experimental Debian desktop
and found what the subjects says :-)
Trying to upgrade xserver-xorg-core from 2:1.9.4-1 to 2:1.9.4-2 tries
to remove nvidia-glx version 260.19.21-1 since it depends on
xorg-video-abi-8.0 but the new xserver-xorg-core provides
13 matches
Mail list logo
