Bug#613546: [Evolution] Bug#613546: libebook1.2-dev: missing dependency on libcamel1.2-dev

2011-02-19 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 15/02/11 17:00, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: tag 613546 pending thanks On mar., 2011-02-15 at 15:47 +, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Since 2.32, libebook1.2-dev requires camel-1.2 on the .pc file. Thus it should depend on libcamel1.2-dev. This is likely to cause other packages to

Bug#613546: [Evolution] Bug#613546: libebook1.2-dev: missing dependency on libcamel1.2-dev

2011-02-19 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On sam., 2011-02-19 at 10:35 +, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On mar., 2011-02-15 at 15:47 +, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Since 2.32, libebook1.2-dev requires camel-1.2 on the .pc file. Thus it should depend on libcamel1.2-dev. This is likely to cause other packages to FTBFS,

Bug#613546: [Evolution] Bug#613546: libebook1.2-dev: missing dependency on libcamel1.2-dev

2011-02-19 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 19/02/11 10:43, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: On sam., 2011-02-19 at 10:35 +, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On mar., 2011-02-15 at 15:47 +, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Since 2.32, libebook1.2-dev requires camel-1.2 on the .pc file. Thus it should depend on libcamel1.2-dev. This is

Bug#613546: [Evolution] Bug#613546: libebook1.2-dev: missing dependency on libcamel1.2-dev

2011-02-15 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
tag 613546 pending thanks On mar., 2011-02-15 at 15:47 +, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Since 2.32, libebook1.2-dev requires camel-1.2 on the .pc file. Thus it should depend on libcamel1.2-dev. This is likely to cause other packages to FTBFS, though I don't have an example right now.