Bug#614032: suckless-tools: should Provide dwm-tools

2018-08-01 Thread Pascal De Vuyst
Control: submitter -1 geo...@ldpreload.com Geofft, This is an old bug, do you still have a use for suckless-tools providing dwm-tools as a virtual package? If not, I am leaning towards rejecting this change, as to not take up the dwm-tools name that can be used by another package in the future.

Bug#614032: suckless-tools: should Provide dwm-tools

2017-08-04 Thread Ilias Tsitsimpis
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 01:19AM, Geoffrey Thomas wrote: > Package: dwm-tools > Version: 38-1 > > Hi, > > I have a site configuration metapackage that depends on dwm-tools to bring > in utilities that our users expect. While I agree that the package shouldn't > really be called dwm-tools (since

Bug#614032: suckless-tools: should Provide dwm-tools

2011-02-18 Thread Geoffrey Thomas
Package: dwm-tools Version: 38-1 Hi, I have a site configuration metapackage that depends on dwm-tools to bring in utilities that our users expect. While I agree that the package shouldn't really be called dwm-tools (since we started installing it for xmonad users, after all), it would be