> "CB" == Cyril Brulebois writes:
>> There's no mention of KMS anywhere
>> in the X accompanying docs.
> Wrong. /usr/share/doc/xserver-xorg-video-intel/README.Debian
A yea, that ONE (missed it b/o package purged by now :(). But not in
either of xorg-docs_1:1.6-1 and xorg-docs-core_1:
enno@gmx.net (07/03/2011):
> > "JC" == Julien Cristau writes:
> > Looks like you have disabled kms. Don't do that.
>
> Now how would I do that?
> […]
> There's no mention of KMS anywhere in the X accompanying docs.
Wrong. /usr/share/doc/xserver-xorg-video-intel/README.Debian
KiBi.
s
> "JC" == Julien Cristau writes:
> Looks like you have disabled kms. Don't do that.
Now how would I do that?
In both my custom 2.6.30 and std debian 2.6.32-5-686 DRM_I915_KMS is not
set -- and says: [...] will cause pain. [...] precludes loading things
like intelfb.
In 2.6.30 there is no D
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 10:53:41 +0100, enno@gmx.net wrote:
> Believe it or not, I can't reproduce the behaviour. I must have
> upgraded some lib involved in this, and I'm sure I won't be able to
> re-establish the exact same software situation on my system, alas.
>
> Instead now the xserver
Believe it or not, I can't reproduce the behaviour. I must have
upgraded some lib involved in this, and I'm sure I won't be able to
re-establish the exact same software situation on my system, alas.
Instead now the xserver-xorg-video-intel thing doesn't even start at
all. No matter if on my cust
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 15:35:01 +0100, enno@gmx.net wrote:
> But should you insist -- I'm prepared to do the test.
>
Yes please. And send the corresponding X and kernel logs.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubsc
Hi,
enno@gmx.net (03/03/2011):
> My kernel is a custom kernel of debian linux-source 2.6.30. I doubt
> that a standard debian kernel would make any difference, as the
> incriminated behaviour does NOT occur when using either
> xserver-xorg-video-fbdev or xserver-xorg-video-vesa drivers (they
Dear Julien,
>> Version: 2:2.3.2-2+lenny8
> This doesn't correspond to the version in your log file below. Which is
> it?
Sorry for the mixup. I had in the meantime downgraded the driver to
have a working X available.
The video driver in question is:
xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.13.0-5
>> Lin
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 13:06:54 +0100, Enno Deimel wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
> Version: 2:2.3.2-2+lenny8
This doesn't correspond to the version in your log file below. Which is
it?
> Severity: important
>
> Video driver spontaneously kills xorg (without apparent causative use
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Version: 2:2.3.2-2+lenny8
Severity: important
Video driver spontaneously kills xorg (without apparent causative user
interaction). Could be severe if occurring with other hardware as well.
Furthermore the driver seems to "grab" video and not releasing it again:
10 matches
Mail list logo
