On 2011-03-11 20:25, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> [...]
>> I also included a sanity check of the values of the field (one of the
>> four listed in your email in all lowercase). I have not added any
>
> Great.
>
>> sanity (cross-)check for multi-arch vs.
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I have added Multi-Arch to the list of known binary fields. I assumed
> it did not apply to udebs, changes and source packages, please correct
> me if I am wrong here.
That's correct.
(For dpkg, udeb are no different from deb and thus they are allowed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-03-04 23:05, Raphaël Hertzog wrote:
> Package: lintian
> Version: 2.5.0~rc1
> Severity: normal
> User: debian-d...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: multiarch
>
> While building my multi-arch dpkg I noted this:
> I: dpkg: unknown-field-in-control
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.0~rc1
Severity: normal
User: debian-d...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: multiarch
While building my multi-arch dpkg I noted this:
I: dpkg: unknown-field-in-control multi-arch
I: dselect: unknown-field-in-control multi-arch
Lintian should learn about this field and not co
4 matches
Mail list logo