On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 08:54:41AM +0100, Eus wrote:
Hi!
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 18:22 +0100, Eus wrote:
If suppose CURLOPT_FOLLOWLOCATION was set when the wireless connection
had been disconnected, then would apt-cacher have cached the login page
of the hotspot provider?
Package: apt-cacher
Version: 1.6.12ubuntu1
Severity: important
apt-get update returns Bad header line. This problem also happens when
using aptitude update and aptitude install although apt-get install works
fine.
Instrumenting the source code of apt-get: methods/http.cc as follows:
---
Some clarifications:
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 11:44 +0100, Tadeus Prastowo wrote:
apt-get update returns Bad header line. This problem also happens
when using aptitude update and aptitude install although apt-get
install works fine.
Actually apt-get install does not work fine. It gives the
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 11:44:16AM +0100, Tadeus Prastowo wrote:
Package: apt-cacher
Version: 1.6.12ubuntu1
Severity: important
apt-get update returns Bad header line. This problem also happens when
using aptitude update and aptitude install although apt-get install
works fine.
Thanks.
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 12:15:43PM +0100, Eus wrote:
Some clarifications:
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 11:44 +0100, Tadeus Prastowo wrote:
apt-get update returns Bad header line. This problem also happens
when using aptitude update and aptitude install although apt-get
install works fine.
Hi!
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 11:07 +, Mark Hindley wrote:
Thanks.
It's my pleasure.
If you apply this patch to /usr/share/apt-cacher/apt-cacher, does it
help?
No, it doesn't. I applied the patch to the mentioned file by changing
{a,b}/apt-cacher2 to {a,b}/apt-cacher. Otherwise, the patch
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 02:09:33PM +0100, Eus wrote:
Hi!
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 11:07 +, Mark Hindley wrote:
Thanks.
It's my pleasure.
If you apply this patch to /usr/share/apt-cacher/apt-cacher, does it
help?
No, it doesn't. I applied the patch to the mentioned file by
Hi!
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 14:53 +, Mark Hindley wrote:
Having applied the patch could you do /etc/init.d/apt-cacher stop and
then ensure there isn't an apt-cacher [libcurl] thread still running (ps
-lfC apt-cacher ought to show it). If there is, kill that pid (or wait 5
minutes for it
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 04:22:43PM +0100, Eus wrote:
Hi!
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 14:53 +, Mark Hindley wrote:
Having applied the patch could you do /etc/init.d/apt-cacher stop and
then ensure there isn't an apt-cacher [libcurl] thread still running (ps
-lfC apt-cacher ought to show
Hi!
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 15:50 +, Mark Hindley wrote:
Specifically, the file to be downloaded does not exist but instead of
passing 404 to the client, apt-cacher returns 302 by, I think, reading
an invalid cached header. I am wondering how can the invalid header
exists in the very
Hi!
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 17:01 +0100, Eus wrote:
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 15:50 +, Mark Hindley wrote:
I suspect it appeared as the CURLOPT_FOLLOWLOCATION was not set.
But, if it is possible, I want to have a long-term solution as well.
What semantic does 404 have in apt-cacher?
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 05:09:53PM +0100, Eus wrote:
Hi!
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 17:01 +0100, Eus wrote:
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 15:50 +, Mark Hindley wrote:
I suspect it appeared as the CURLOPT_FOLLOWLOCATION was not set.
But, if it is possible, I want to have a long-term
Hi!
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 16:45 +, Mark Hindley wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 05:09:53PM +0100, Eus wrote:
Hi!
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 17:01 +0100, Eus wrote:
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 15:50 +, Mark Hindley wrote:
I suspect it appeared as the CURLOPT_FOLLOWLOCATION was
13 matches
Mail list logo
