b...@decadent.org.uk wrote on 04/03/2011 06:06:24 AM:
Hi Ben,
This can lead to a loss of network connectivity for the host and/or
the
management card eventually.
How does the host lose connectivity?
I'm somewhat wary of cherry-picking such a patch without a very good
reason.
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 08:45:40AM +0200, Julien-externe BLACHE wrote:
b...@decadent.org.uk wrote on 04/03/2011 06:06:24 AM:
Hi Ben,
This can lead to a loss of network connectivity for the host and/or
the
management card eventually.
How does the host lose connectivity?
I'm
b...@decadent.org.uk wrote on 04/04/2011 12:58:24 PM:
Hi,
I expect that at some point we'll want to update the driver to add new
hardware support, and then we'll pick this up along the way. Until
then, however, I'm not going to apply it.
I don't understand your decision; upgrading the whole
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 02:08:41PM +0200, Julien-externe BLACHE wrote:
b...@decadent.org.uk wrote on 04/04/2011 12:58:24 PM:
Hi,
I expect that at some point we'll want to update the driver to add new
hardware support, and then we'll pick this up along the way. Until
then, however, I'm
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 08:36 +0200, Julien-externe BLACHE wrote:
Source: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-31
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
The igb driver up to 2.6.34 uses an incorrect check to detect the presence
of a management card sharing the network interface.
This can lead to a
Source: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-31
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
The igb driver up to 2.6.34 uses an incorrect check to detect the presence
of a management card sharing the network interface.
This can lead to a loss of network connectivity for the host and/or the
management card
6 matches
Mail list logo
