On Mon, 04 Apr 2011, Craig Sanders wrote:
any chance of dpkg being less spammy about it? i guess some kind of
notification is required but it's not a major problem, so doesn't need
a couple of lines of output per package. perhaps a single summary line
mentioning the problem and listing the
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.16.0
I just upgraded dpkg to 1.16.0 today and noticed the following three problems:
1. it segfaulted! (fortunately, /var/lib/dpkg/status wasn't corrupted)
2. it claimed it was installing a package called 'x)' which does
not exist. probably related to #1 above
Hi,
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011, Craig Sanders wrote:
1. it segfaulted! (fortunately, /var/lib/dpkg/status wasn't corrupted)
2. it claimed it was installing a package called 'x)' which does
not exist. probably related to #1 above (buffer overrun or similar,
perhaps?)
(in case those
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 03:16:33PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011, Craig Sanders wrote:
1. it segfaulted! (fortunately, /var/lib/dpkg/status wasn't corrupted)
2. it claimed it was installing a package called 'x)' which does
not exist. probably related to #1
4 matches
Mail list logo
