On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 10:31:59PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
On 17.4.2011, at 22:17, Niko Tyni nt...@debian.org wrote:
I'm somewhat inclined to just throw in the towel, switch to libdb-dev
(Ubuntu already does), and let somebody else worry about db transition
risks. It's not like I know
OK, I'm convinced. Let's go for libdb-dev then.
Cool, thanks.
I'm happy to hand this responsibility to the libdb maintainers.
I'll do my best.
FWIW, I inherited the versioned libdb-dev dependencies and have never
discussed them with the previous perl maintainers. The DB transitions
we've
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 11:17:38PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 12:52:53PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Anyway I don't think the move from 4.7 to 4.8 is any less riskier than
move from 4.7 to 5.1. The 4.x vs 5.x is nothing more than inability to
have 4.10 version number.
Hi Dominic,
All that said, I think it largely depends on the libdb team being
able to describe what their strategy is. The versioned -dev packages
were presumably introduced for a reason; are they staying, and for
what purposes are they now intended?
I took over Berkeley DB after Clint
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 04:47:50PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
I took over Berkeley DB after Clint orphaned all packages, so I don't
know what he had in mind, but I have tried to summarize my plan as a
The reason I made the db source package that generated a real
libdb-dev package (this regressed
Clint, feel free to comment or edit those wiki pages if you feel something is
wrong or missing.
And thanks for maintaining Berkeley DB and preparing the infrastructure for the
reduction.
Ondřej Surý
On 18.4.2011, at 17:03, Clint Adams cl...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 05:09:06PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Clint, feel free to comment or edit those wiki pages if you feel something is
wrong or missing.
I was just clarifying my position; you're the one doing the work
now so I defer to your judgment. Good luck!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 04:47:50PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Hi Dominic,
All that said, I think it largely depends on the libdb team being
able to describe what their strategy is. The versioned -dev packages
were presumably introduced for a reason; are they staying, and for
what
(switching the perl package CC to #621383)
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 12:52:53PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 06:11, Niko Tyni nt...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:29:21PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Niko, could you change the linking from -ldb to -ldb-4.7
On 17.4.2011, at 22:17, Niko Tyni nt...@debian.org wrote:
I'm somewhat inclined to just throw in the towel, switch to libdb-dev
(Ubuntu already does), and let somebody else worry about db transition
risks. It's not like I know much about them anyway.
Do that pretty please;-). I'll guarantee
10 matches
Mail list logo
