block 622363 with 637067
kthxbye
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 23:18:33 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
tag 622363 pending
kthxbye
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 16:28:00 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
We would like to perform the transition from libnotify1 to libnotify4.
Let's go ahead with
On sam., 2011-07-30 at 23:18 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
tag 622363 pending
kthxbye
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 16:28:00 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
We would like to perform the transition from libnotify1 to libnotify4.
Let's go ahead with this.
As added on #630268, evolution 3.0
On lun., 2011-08-01 at 19:35 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
As added on #630268, evolution 3.0 works with libnotify 0.7 but it needs
libgdata from experimental, not sure if it's supposed to happen soon (I
didn't really touch 3.x branch at all). I can try to build evolution
2.32 against
On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 22:11 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
So it doesn't look really good, I guess those were fixed somehow in 3.0
branch, but as 2.32 is starting to be a bit old, I'm not really sure
there's much support on that, and especially not on --enable-gtk3=yes.
I'll try a bit more
On lun., 2011-08-01 at 22:48 +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 22:11 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
So it doesn't look really good, I guess those were fixed somehow in
3.0
branch, but as 2.32 is starting to be a bit old, I'm not really sure
there's much support on that,
Le Sat, 30 Jul 2011 23:18:33 +0200,
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org a écrit :
Let's go ahead with this.
Alright,
So here a first list of packages that can be binNMU'ed (their transition
bug is marked as closed in unstable):
nmu alarm-clock-applet_0.3.2-1 gnunet-gtk_0.8.1a-3 . ALL -i386 .
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 12:21:26 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
Le Sat, 30 Jul 2011 23:18:33 +0200,
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org a écrit :
Let's go ahead with this.
Alright,
So here a first list of packages that can be binNMU'ed (their transition
bug is marked as closed in
Le Sun, 31 Jul 2011 12:21:26 +0200,
Laurent Bigonville bi...@debian.org a écrit :
Le Sat, 30 Jul 2011 23:18:33 +0200,
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org a écrit :
Let's go ahead with this.
Alright,
So here a first list of packages that can be binNMU'ed (their
transition bug is marked
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 21:28:54 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
nmu eiskaltdcpp_2.2.3-1 florence_0.5.0-3 linuxdcpp_1.1.0-1
mail-notification_5.4.dfsg.1-2.4 midori_0.3.6-2 openfetion_2.2.1-2
orage_4.8.1-2 parole_0.2.0.6-1 pcmanx-gtk2_1.0-2 postler_0.1.1-1
psensor_0.6.1.9-2
tag 622363 pending
kthxbye
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 16:28:00 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
We would like to perform the transition from libnotify1 to libnotify4.
Let's go ahead with this.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Hi!
In order to get a fix for deja-dup in the next stable release [1], a
newer version needs to land in unstable first. But it is not possible
until libnotify0.7 itself is uploaded there. So I have done some work to
move this transition forward.
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 02:36:22PM +0200, Mehdi
Hello,
Sorry for the delay in getting back to you.
On 09/06/2011 00:07, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
Le Wed, 25 May 2011 15:08:39 +0200,
Mehdi Dogguy me...@debian.org a écrit :
@Laurent: Do you know already which packages will need a sourceful
upload? Reporting bugs against those and
On 16/06/2011 14:07, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
That's ~70% of involved packages. It's a bit high, IMHO. Can you please
report bugs against those packages with severity:important (for those
failing specifically because of libnotify 0.7) and usertag them?
AFAICS, some of them are already reported,
Laurent Bigonville bi...@debian.org wrote:
I've uploaded the buildlog here:
http://people.debian.org/~bigon/libnotify0.7_rebuildlog/
FTR:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org;tag=libnotify0.7-transition
--
Mehdi Dogguy
--
To
Le Wed, 25 May 2011 15:08:39 +0200,
Mehdi Dogguy me...@debian.org a écrit :
@Laurent: Do you know already which packages will need a sourceful
upload? Reporting bugs against those and user-tagging the reports
would help to see what's needed.
During the weekend I've rebuilt all the packages
On 15/05/2011 11:26, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 16:28:00 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
We would like to perform the transition from libnotify1 to libnotify4.
This transition will requires sourcefull uploads as there is a
(minimal) API change.
That's not good. If the
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 16:28:00 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
We would like to perform the transition from libnotify1 to libnotify4.
This transition will requires sourcefull uploads as there is a
(minimal) API change.
That's not good. If the packages can be made to support both APIs
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
We would like to perform the transition from libnotify1 to libnotify4.
This transition will requires sourcefull uploads as there is a (minimal) API
change.
libnotify 0.7 is
On mar., 2011-04-12 at 16:28 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
We would like to perform the transition from libnotify1 to libnotify4.
This transition will requires sourcefull uploads as there is a
(minimal) API change.
Note that some packages might already have some #ifdefs to manage it and
block 622363 with 619874
thanks
On 04/12/2011 06:19 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On mar., 2011-04-12 at 16:28 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
We would like to perform the transition from libnotify1 to libnotify4.
This transition will requires sourcefull uploads as there is a
(minimal) API
20 matches
Mail list logo
