Bug#624514: RM: libdc0 [armel] -- RoM; FTBFS

2011-04-29 Thread Maia Kozheva
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal The Qt 4 version libdc0 has been failing to build on armel for a long time now (due to failing a test). As Qt 3 is being phased out, I suggest removing libdc0 on armel to at least let it enter testing. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally

Bug#624514: RM: libdc0 [armel] -- RoM; FTBFS

2011-04-29 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
reassign 624514 release.debian.org thanks Hi! * Maia Kozheva si...@ubuntu.com [110429 09:35]: The Qt 4 version libdc0 has been failing to build on armel for a long time now (due to failing a test). As Qt 3 is being phased out, I suggest removing libdc0 on armel to at least let it enter

Bug#624514: RM: libdc0 [armel] -- RoM; FTBFS

2011-04-29 Thread Maia Kozheva
Actually, hold on with this one! I've uploaded a new SVN snapshot on mentors that fixes this FTBFS, at least on my qemu pbuilder. I'll ask for it to get sponsored. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#624514: RM: libdc0 [armel] -- RoM; FTBFS

2011-04-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
reassign 624514 ftp.debian.org thanks On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 11:29 +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: * Maia Kozheva si...@ubuntu.com [110429 09:35]: The Qt 4 version libdc0 has been failing to build on armel for a long time now (due to failing a test). As Qt 3 is being phased out,

Bug#624514: RM: libdc0 [armel] -- RoM; FTBFS

2011-04-29 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
retitle 624514 please drop armel from supported arches reassign 624514 libdc0 thanks Hi! Am 29.04.2011 14:14, schrieb Adam D. Barratt: Removals from the testing branch are done by the release team, Source removals, yes. Binary removals from testing _aren't_ done, rather the binaries are