On Thu, May 19, 2011, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> This patch indeed fixes the reported issue, but the package still FTBFS
> due to a binutils bug. I'll report the bug to binutils later this week.
binutils bug is http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12726
I think the fix was uploaded to un
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 03:17:00PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> tags 625000 + patch
> stop
>
> Hey
>
> I didn't try to rebuild the Debian package with the fix, but this seems
> fixed upstream in 88db9fd632bf3f650244ec69e2f4fd6b2aa5fd3d; this is a
> new error raised by gcc-4.6. Attachin
tags 625000 + patch
stop
Hey
I didn't try to rebuild the Debian package with the fix, but this seems
fixed upstream in 88db9fd632bf3f650244ec69e2f4fd6b2aa5fd3d; this is a
new error raised by gcc-4.6. Attaching the upstream diff.
Cheers,
--
Loïc Minier
>From 88db9fd632bf3f650244ec
Source: seabios
Version: 0.6.1.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directo
4 matches
Mail list logo
