Bug#627452: dpkg: please provide --deconfigure command

2011-05-20 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Package: dpkg Version: 1.15.8.10 Severity: wishlist As it was discovered in some places (#558151), some system modifications cannot be sanely made without specifying --auto-deconfigure to dpkg. Please provide a --deconfigure command, so dpkg front-ends can plan and request deconfigurations

Bug#627452: dpkg: please provide --deconfigure command

2011-05-20 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi Eugene, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: As it was discovered in some places (#558151), some system modifications cannot be sanely made without specifying --auto-deconfigure to dpkg. Please provide a --deconfigure command, so dpkg front-ends can plan and request deconfigurations themselves. I

Bug#627452: dpkg: please provide --deconfigure command

2011-05-20 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hi Jonathan, Thanks for adding more examples to the list, but On 2011-05-20 13:16, Jonathan Nieder wrote: But the motivational example libc6 Depends: libc-bin (= ${binary:Version}) libc-binBreaks: libc6 ( 2.10) does not seem like a great example for this. libc6

Bug#627452: dpkg: please provide --deconfigure command

2011-05-20 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: On 2011-05-20 13:16, Jonathan Nieder wrote: unpack libc6 unpack libc-bin configure libc-bin configure libc6 Emm, the whole #558151 was about the order above does not work unless you specify --force-bad-path which Guillem was much against.

Bug#627452: dpkg: please provide --deconfigure command

2011-05-20 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi again, A quick note to finish the tangent. Jonathan Nieder wrote: In an ideal world, the upgrade path would be unpack libc-bin unpack libc6 configure libc-bin configure libc6 with no deconfigure step (essential packages are not supposed to ever need to be