Hi Aurélien,
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 23:59:03 +0200, Aurelien Jarno
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:09:02AM +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
>> Le jeudi 04 août 2011 10:25:34, Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
>> > Both build failures in experimental are due to the switch to gcj-4.6
as
>> > a bootstrappi
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:09:02AM +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> Le jeudi 04 août 2011 10:25:34, Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
> > Both build failures in experimental are due to the switch to gcj-4.6 as
> > a bootstrapping compiler. They build fine when using gcj-4.4, and it
> > seems it's what ha
* Damien Raude-Morvan (draz...@drazzib.com) [110810 00:09]:
> Le jeudi 04 août 2011 10:25:34, Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
> > Both build failures in experimental are due to the switch to gcj-4.6 as
> > a bootstrapping compiler. They build fine when using gcj-4.4, and it
> > seems it's what has to be d
Le jeudi 04 août 2011 10:25:34, Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
> Both build failures in experimental are due to the switch to gcj-4.6 as
> a bootstrapping compiler. They build fine when using gcj-4.4, and it
> seems it's what has to be done so that mips doesn't block anything. I am
> working to find the
4 matches
Mail list logo