Hi Kurt,
So I would like to drop the patch, but cacert.org.pem still
contains 2 cert files.
Michael, could you please consider splitting that file?
A version of ca-certificates that spits cacert.org.pem has just been
accepted into unstable.
Cheers,
Thijs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 01:38:30PM -0500, Michael Shuler wrote:
On 07/29/2012 07:53 AM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:15:50AM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
Just thought of another minor issue with the new c_rehash handling
multiple certs in the same file: when a piece of
On 07/29/2012 07:53 AM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:15:50AM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
Just thought of another minor issue with the new c_rehash handling
multiple certs in the same file: when a piece of software follows the
hashed symlink, the certificate it's looking for
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:15:50AM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
Just thought of another minor issue with the new c_rehash handling
multiple certs in the same file: when a piece of software follows the
hashed symlink, the certificate it's looking for might not be the first
one. Is this
Just thought of another minor issue with the new c_rehash handling
multiple certs in the same file: when a piece of software follows the
hashed symlink, the certificate it's looking for might not be the first
one. Is this verified to work with gnutls and openssl implementations?
I wonder
Hi
The patch from Debian #628780 caused a regression with certificates
using CRLF line-endings, which prompted me to take a look at the
discussion here. (Debian #642314 is the regression.)
Outside of CRLF line-endings, there seems to be potential for more
regressions in this patch:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello Loïc and others,
lets address the comment in the right order not in the order of
severity.
Am Mi den 21. Sep 2011 um 14:49 schrieb Loïc Minier:
The patch from Debian #628780 caused a regression with certificates
using CRLF line-endings,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
Hmm.. I think, certificates on unix with CRLF line ending is broken and
should be fixed.
You mean people should not use CRLF in their certificates when running
Debian? Or you mean we should fix support for CRLF in certificates? I
have absolutely no
And a last version of my patch that also handles clean the duplicated
certs. (ca-certificates.crt is always a problem but do not handle
special in this patch.)
Regards
Klaus
--
Klaus Ethgen http://www.ethgen.ch/
pub 4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16 Klaus Ethgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Package: ca-certificates
Version: 20110421
Severity: important
The current links to the cacert.org.pem are 5ed36f99.0 and 99d0fa06.0.
Thie first certificate in that file is correct 99d0fa06.0 but the second
certificate hash is 590d426f.0 _not_
10 matches
Mail list logo
