Bug#630710: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#630710: please add Breaks: libgl1-nvidia-alternatives (= 275.09.07-1)

2011-06-17 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Am 17.06.2011 09:43, schrieb Julien Cristau: On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 00:57:14 +0200, Mario Palomo wrote: Cyril Bruleboisk...@debian.org (16/06/2011): I'll try and get that done tomorrow, along with the CXXFLAGS patch we received some days ago. FGLRX folks, want a Breaks too? Now would be

Bug#630710: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#630710: please add Breaks: libgl1-nvidia-alternatives (= 275.09.07-1)

2011-06-17 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Patrick Matthäi pmatth...@debian.org (17/06/2011): It should be 1:11-6-1 (where it will be fixed hopefuly) Ah, giving you more time = 1 minute and 19 seconds? Fine. :D Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#630710: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#630710: please add Breaks: libgl1-nvidia-alternatives (= 275.09.07-1)

2011-06-17 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Patrick Matthäi pmatth...@debian.org (17/06/2011): It should be 1:11-6-1 (where it will be fixed hopefuly) Wild guess, we need a Breaks on: fglrx-glx ( 1:11-6-1) from libgl1-mesa-glx, correct? Not sure how your stuff works. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#630710: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#630710: please add Breaks: libgl1-nvidia-alternatives (= 275.09.07-1)

2011-06-17 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Am 17.06.2011 11:16, schrieb Cyril Brulebois: Patrick Matthäipmatth...@debian.org (17/06/2011): It should be 1:11-6-1 (where it will be fixed hopefuly) Wild guess, we need a Breaks on: fglrx-glx ( 1:11-6-1) from libgl1-mesa-glx, correct? It is right, that fglrx-glx-ia32 is no longer