On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 12:47:50AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Patrick Ouellette wrote:
>
> > What about just noting the license for ripdump.c is now BSD?
>
> I assume that means you think the patch to listen/ripdump.c
> itself is ok. A changelog entry stating
>
> * The permission notice i
Last you checked. THINGS MIGHT HAVE CHANGED SINCE THEN
Sent from my PDP-11
On Jul 28, 2012, at 1:00 PM, shawn wrote:
>
>> + * 3. Neither the name of the University nor the names of its
> contributors
>> + * may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this
> software
>> + *
> + * 3. Neither the name of the University nor the names of its
contributors
> + * may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this
software
> + * without specific prior written permission.
Jeff is not a "University"
--
-Shawn Landden
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-b
Patrick Ouellette wrote:
> What about just noting the license for ripdump.c is now BSD?
I assume that means you think the patch to listen/ripdump.c
itself is ok. A changelog entry stating
* The permission notice in listen/ripdump.c has been changed to
use the BSD license.
or whatever wordi
What about just noting the license for ripdump.c is now BSD?
It is not like Jeff said "here I now license my work for commercial
use" (even if that is now possible). He DID say BSD license.
Pat
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 12:48:03AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> Hi Ralf et al,
>
> How about
Hi Ralf et al,
How about this patch? Patch is against ax25-apps from cvs.linux-ax25.org.
-- >8 --
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 02:28:50PM -0500, Jeff White wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Sam Geeraerts wrote:
>> Jeff White wrote:
>>> I release all of my code from the rip-2 project (includi
GPL compatible 3-clause BSD license.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Sam Geeraerts wrote:
> Jeff White wrote:
>
>> I release all of my code from the rip-2 project (including ripdump.c)
>> under
>> the BSD license.
>>
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Thanks for relicensing. Just to be clear: by "the BSD license"
Jeff White wrote:
I release all of my code from the rip-2 project (including ripdump.c) under
the BSD license.
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for relicensing. Just to be clear: by "the BSD license" do you
mean the (GPL compatible) 3-clause BSD license [1] or the (GPL
incompatible) 4-clause BSD license [2]?
eeds to let Jeff know.
>
> I want to thank Jeff again for agreeing to release the code under a license
> that allows it to remain in the main Debian free software repository.
>
> Pat
>
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 01:37:35PM +0100, Sam Geeraerts wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 18 Mar 20
bject: Re: Bug#630893: ax25-apps: Should be removed from main
> To: Patrick Ouellette
> CC: Sebastian Muszynski
>
> Patrick Ouellette wrote:
> >We are working on a resolution to the issue.
>
> Hi Patrick,
>
> Have you been in contact with Jeff White? I believe Seb
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 06:32:12PM -0500, Patrick Ouellette wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 10:16:19PM +, Javi Merino wrote:
> >
> > Package: ax25-apps
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Jeff White was contacted in June 2011 asking him to relicence the code
> > but he didn't reply. This package should be
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 10:16:19PM +, Javi Merino wrote:
>
> Package: ax25-apps
>
> Hi,
>
> Jeff White was contacted in June 2011 asking him to relicence the code
> but he didn't reply. This package should be moved to non-free.
>
How, exactly, does commenting on a bug report with absolute
Package: ax25-apps
Hi,
Jeff White was contacted in June 2011 asking him to relicence the code
but he didn't reply. This package should be moved to non-free.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.4
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (800, 'stable'), (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable-updates'
Sebastian Muszynski has sent an e-mail to the copyright holder to ask
about relicensing the code. No response so far, afaik. See bug report
#630894.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.
Hallo,
has anyone tried to ask n0poy if he insists on his copyright to changes of GPL
code (which ka9q actually is)?
Else we have to reimplement the code ans scratch the gpl-conflicting code from
the sources.
vy 73,
- Thomas dl9sau
On 2011-07-25 05:03:26 -0400, Chuck Hemker
wrote
Maybe I'm confused but if ripdump.c is the only bad file, then your throwing
several apps (including call) into non-free just because listen happens to
decode rip packets with a non-free routine.
It would make more sense to me remove the ripdump.c and to #ifdef out the
portion of udpdump.c that
I agree.
Jaime
El 25/07/2011, a las 04:02, Samuel Fogh escribió:
> So shouldn't we just take a pragmatic approach and move it to non-free,
> with a changelog notice pointing to this bug then?
>
> What can I do to make it happen?
>
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hams-requ...@
So shouldn't we just take a pragmatic approach and move it to non-free,
with a changelog notice pointing to this bug then?
What can I do to make it happen?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.
Note that the same file exists also in ax25spyd. See bug report #630894.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: ax25-apps
Version: 0.0.6-16.2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1.6
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense
The file listen/ripdump.c has the following license notice:
* Changes Copyright (c) 1993 Jeff White - N0POY, All Rights Reserved.
* Permission granted for no
20 matches
Mail list logo
