Bug#632673: Processed: Re: Bug#632673: libpam0g: Kills gdm3 when upgrading package

2011-07-05 Thread Josselin Mouette
reassign 632673 libpam0g 1.1.1-6.1 severity 632673 critical tag 632673 squeeze wheezy sid thanks Steve Langasek wrote: Not a bug in pam. We *explicitly* avoid restarting gdm in the libpam postinst, instead calling /etc/init.d/gdm reload because gdm is one of the few services that we can get

Bug#632673: Processed: Re: Bug#632673: libpam0g: Kills gdm3 when upgrading package

2011-07-05 Thread Steve Langasek
reassign 632673 gdm3 thanks On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 10:00:01AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: reassign 632673 libpam0g 1.1.1-6.1 severity 632673 critical tag 632673 squeeze wheezy sid thanks Steve Langasek wrote: Not a bug in pam. We *explicitly* avoid restarting gdm in the libpam

Bug#632673: Processed: Re: Bug#632673: libpam0g: Kills gdm3 when upgrading package

2011-07-05 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 05 juillet 2011 à 01:19 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit : *What* bug? libpam0g doesn't invoke /etc/init.d/gdm3, in any version of the package. It invokes /etc/init.d/gdm only with the 'reload' option, which is guaranteed by policy not to restart the service. If calling

Bug#632673: Processed: Re: Bug#632673: libpam0g: Kills gdm3 when upgrading package

2011-07-05 Thread Steve Langasek
reassign 632673 libpam0g found 632673 1.1.3-2 tags 632673 = wheezy sid confirmed severity 632673 serious thanks On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 10:43:14AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: Nonsense. If there's a bug here at all, it's not in pam. It’s a pam upgrade which (supposedly) triggered the