On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 06:28:53PM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
>> Well, given the lack of documentation, especially on upgrade process,
>> and my previous experience with generally painful upgrades from
>> version to version (0.60 entirely br
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 06:28:53PM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 05:38:16PM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
>
> >> In any case, the fact is it breaks the virtual resolver for packages with
> >> multiple providers (i've
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 05:38:16PM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
>> In any case, the fact is it breaks the virtual resolver for packages with
>> multiple providers (i've tested that when there's only one provider, there
>> is no problem. I su
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 05:38:16PM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> I've recently discovered that some of my packages stopped building because of
> the following error:
>
> Checking for source dependency conflicts...
> E: Package 'libjpeg-dev' has no installation candidate
> libjpeg-dev is a virtua
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 05:38:16PM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> I've recently discovered that some of my packages stopped building because of
> the following error:
> Checking for source dependency conflicts...
> E: Package 'libjpeg-dev' has no installation candidate
You shouldn't have two prov
5 matches
Mail list logo
