Bug#638728: [Debian-arabic-packages] Bug#638728: debsums reports that some aspell-fa files have changed

2013-06-28 Thread Agustin Martin
tag 638728 + patch thanks On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:57:59AM +0200, Francois Gouget wrote: Hi, I don't know if it can help for aspell-ar-large or aspell-fa, but the same bug has just been fixed in aspell-bg and aspell-uk. So just in case these point to a solution to fix this, here are

Bug#638724: [Debian-arabic-packages] Bug#638728: debsums reports that some aspell-fa files have changed

2011-08-22 Thread Francois Gouget
Hi, I don't know if it can help for aspell-ar-large or aspell-fa, but the same bug has just been fixed in aspell-bg and aspell-uk. So just in case these point to a solution to fix this, here are the relevant bugs and changelog snippets: aspell-bg: * do not ship empty files overwritten by

Bug#638728: debsums reports that some aspell-fa files have changed

2011-08-21 Thread Francois Gouget
Package: aspell-fa Version: 0.11-0-2 Severity: normal Install aspell-fa and immediately run 'debsums -s aspell-fa'. The output is: debsums: changed file /var/lib/aspell/fa-common.rws (from aspell-fa package) debsums: changed file /var/lib/aspell/fa-generic.rws (from aspell-fa package) debsums:

Bug#638724: [Debian-arabic-packages] Bug#638728: debsums reports that some aspell-fa files have changed

2011-08-21 Thread Lior Kaplan
Hi, Thanks for your reports. The aspell dictionaries are designed to be built on the users's machine. So all these bugs aren't going to be solved right now. I agreed that having different MD5 sums is a problem, but I think we should have a discussion before changing the method of building these