Package: libreoffice-base
Version: 1:3.3.4-1
Severity: important
When upgrading to the newest package, dpkg fails to unpack the .deb file:
Preparing to replace libreoffice-base 1:3.3.4-1 (using .../libreoffice-
base_1%3a3.3.4-2_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libreoffice-base ...
dpkg:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 08:50:03AM +0200, Matthias Cramer wrote:
When upgrading to the newest package, dpkg fails to unpack the .deb file:
Preparing to replace libreoffice-base 1:3.3.4-1 (using .../libreoffice-
base_1%3a3.3.4-2_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libreoffice-base ...
tag 639229 + moreinfo
tag 639229 + unreproducible
thanks
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:19:27AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 08:50:03AM +0200, Matthias Cramer wrote:
When upgrading to the newest package, dpkg fails to unpack the .deb file:
Preparing to replace
Hi Rene
Deleted the file on the disk twice and let apt-get re download it. Same
issue. I was thinking probably the package on the ftp server is broken.
Other packages install fine...
Can you send me an MD5 sum of your package to verify or is this a stupid
idea because they are signed anyway ?
reassign 639229 dpkg
quit
Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 08:50:03AM +0200, Matthias Cramer wrote:
When upgrading to the newest package, dpkg fails to unpack the .deb file:
Preparing to replace libreoffice-base 1:3.3.4-1 (using .../libreoffice-
base_1%3a3.3.4-2_amd64.deb) ...
Hi Jonathan
dpkg is version 1.16.0.3
Regards
Matthias
On 08/25/11 11:51, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
reassign 639229 dpkg
quit
Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 08:50:03AM +0200, Matthias Cramer wrote:
When upgrading to the newest package, dpkg fails to unpack the .deb file:
Hi!
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 11:57:42 +0200, Matthias Cramer wrote:
On 08/25/11 11:51, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 08:50:03AM +0200, Matthias Cramer wrote:
When upgrading to the newest package, dpkg fails to unpack the .deb file:
Preparing to
Hi Guillem
On 08/25/11 13:05, Guillem Jover wrote:
The relevant question here would be, what file system(s) are you using?
Maybe some encrypted stuff? At some point it was discovered some of
those was not really POSIX compliant and got fixed but maybe you are
using an old version of that?
Hi
I made a strace on dpkg -i and at the end I see the following
readlink(/usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/classes/sdbc_hsqldb.jar,
\302\f\20...,
148) = 3
write(2, dpkg: ../../src/archives.c:824: ..., 81dpkg:
../../src/archives.c:824: tarobject: Assertion `r == stab.st_size' failed.
an ls
retitle 639229 dpkg: Make readlink assert output more useful
thanks
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 13:54:18 +0200, Matthias Cramer wrote:
I made a strace on dpkg -i and at the end I see the following
readlink(/usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/classes/sdbc_hsqldb.jar,
\302\f\20...,
148) = 3
10 matches
Mail list logo
