On 04/09/11 at 16:25 -0700, Ryan Niebur wrote:
Hi Francesco,
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 11:53:59PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
I've uploaded a new version of dpkg-ruby, so libdpkg-ruby1.8 can
be replaced by dpkg-ruby (= 3.7.7).
Hi Ryan!
Shouldn't it be ruby-dpkg, rather than
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 07:43:03AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 04/09/11 at 16:25 -0700, Ryan Niebur wrote:
Hi Francesco,
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 11:53:59PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
I've uploaded a new version of dpkg-ruby, so libdpkg-ruby1.8 can
be replaced by
On 04/09/11 at 00:54 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
On Sat, 3 Sep 2011 22:32:19 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
[...]
Hi,
Hi Lucas, thanks a lot for your kind reply!
Do you know why those versioned deps were introduced?
Well, actually, after digging into the git repository, I
On 04.09.11 Lucas Nussbaum (lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net) wrote:
On 04/09/11 at 00:54 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
Hi,
Good, if what I discovered doesn't change the conclusion, I'll
keep the versioned dependency.
Please do.
If you want to facilitate backports, maybe use something like:
On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 12:17:04 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote:
On 04.09.11 Lucas Nussbaum (lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net) wrote:
[...]
If you want to facilitate backports, maybe use something like:
ruby-cmdparse2 (= X) | libcmdparse2-ruby (= X)
I don't think that backporting apt-listbugs to Debian
On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 08:16:48 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 04/09/11 at 00:54 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
Good, if what I discovered doesn't change the conclusion, I'll keep the
versioned dependency.
Please do.
OK, thanks for confirming that it is recommendable.
If you want to
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 10:35:04AM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.1.5
Severity: important
Dear Maintainers,
I just noticed that apt-listbugs depends on a few transitional packages.
Please consider to correct these and to replace them by the correct depends:
On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 14:24:31 -0700 Ryan Niebur wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 10:35:04AM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.1.5
Severity: important
Dear Maintainers,
I just noticed that apt-listbugs depends on a few transitional packages.
Please
Hi Francesco,
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 11:53:59PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
I've uploaded a new version of dpkg-ruby, so libdpkg-ruby1.8 can
be replaced by dpkg-ruby (= 3.7.7).
Hi Ryan!
Shouldn't it be ruby-dpkg, rather than dpkg-ruby, according to the new
Ruby Debian package
On 02/09/11 at 19:24 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 11:31:24 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote:
On 01.09.11 Francesco Poli (invernom...@paranoici.org) wrote:
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:35:04 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
dep: libhttpclient-ruby1.8 (= 2.1.5.2-1)
On Sat, 3 Sep 2011 22:32:19 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
[...]
Hi,
Hi Lucas, thanks a lot for your kind reply!
Do you know why those versioned deps were introduced?
Well, actually, after digging into the git repository, I remembered that
the versioned dependency was introduced by me for a
On 01.09.11 Francesco Poli (invernom...@paranoici.org) wrote:
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:35:04 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
dep: libhttpclient-ruby1.8 (= 2.1.5.2-1)
Transitional package for ruby-httpclient
also a virtual package provided by ruby-httpclient
Should I keep the
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 11:31:24 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote:
On 01.09.11 Francesco Poli (invernom...@paranoici.org) wrote:
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:35:04 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
dep: libhttpclient-ruby1.8 (= 2.1.5.2-1)
Transitional package for ruby-httpclient
also a
Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.1.5
Severity: important
Dear Maintainers,
I just noticed that apt-listbugs depends on a few transitional packages.
Please consider to correct these and to replace them by the correct depends:
dep: libhttpclient-ruby1.8 (= 2.1.5.2-1)
Transitional package for
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:35:04 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.1.5
Severity: important
Dear Maintainers,
I just noticed that apt-listbugs depends on a few transitional packages.
Please consider to correct these and to replace them by the correct depends:
Dear
15 matches
Mail list logo