Bug#639972: apt-listbugs: Depends on a few of transitional packages

2011-09-05 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 04/09/11 at 16:25 -0700, Ryan Niebur wrote: Hi Francesco, On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 11:53:59PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: I've uploaded a new version of dpkg-ruby, so libdpkg-ruby1.8 can be replaced by dpkg-ruby (= 3.7.7). Hi Ryan! Shouldn't it be ruby-dpkg, rather than

Bug#639972: apt-listbugs: Depends on a few of transitional packages

2011-09-05 Thread Ryan Niebur
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 07:43:03AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 04/09/11 at 16:25 -0700, Ryan Niebur wrote: Hi Francesco, On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 11:53:59PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: I've uploaded a new version of dpkg-ruby, so libdpkg-ruby1.8 can be replaced by

Bug#639972: apt-listbugs: Depends on a few of transitional packages

2011-09-04 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 04/09/11 at 00:54 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: On Sat, 3 Sep 2011 22:32:19 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: [...] Hi, Hi Lucas, thanks a lot for your kind reply! Do you know why those versioned deps were introduced? Well, actually, after digging into the git repository, I

Bug#639972: apt-listbugs: Depends on a few of transitional packages

2011-09-04 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 04.09.11 Lucas Nussbaum (lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net) wrote: On 04/09/11 at 00:54 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: Hi, Good, if what I discovered doesn't change the conclusion, I'll keep the versioned dependency. Please do. If you want to facilitate backports, maybe use something like:

Bug#639972: apt-listbugs: Depends on a few of transitional packages

2011-09-04 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 12:17:04 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote: On 04.09.11 Lucas Nussbaum (lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net) wrote: [...] If you want to facilitate backports, maybe use something like: ruby-cmdparse2 (= X) | libcmdparse2-ruby (= X) I don't think that backporting apt-listbugs to Debian

Bug#639972: apt-listbugs: Depends on a few of transitional packages

2011-09-04 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 08:16:48 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 04/09/11 at 00:54 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] Good, if what I discovered doesn't change the conclusion, I'll keep the versioned dependency. Please do. OK, thanks for confirming that it is recommendable. If you want to

Bug#639972: apt-listbugs: Depends on a few of transitional packages

2011-09-04 Thread Ryan Niebur
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 10:35:04AM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote: Package: apt-listbugs Version: 0.1.5 Severity: important Dear Maintainers, I just noticed that apt-listbugs depends on a few transitional packages. Please consider to correct these and to replace them by the correct depends:

Bug#639972: apt-listbugs: Depends on a few of transitional packages

2011-09-04 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 14:24:31 -0700 Ryan Niebur wrote: On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 10:35:04AM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote: Package: apt-listbugs Version: 0.1.5 Severity: important Dear Maintainers, I just noticed that apt-listbugs depends on a few transitional packages. Please

Bug#639972: apt-listbugs: Depends on a few of transitional packages

2011-09-04 Thread Ryan Niebur
Hi Francesco, On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 11:53:59PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: I've uploaded a new version of dpkg-ruby, so libdpkg-ruby1.8 can be replaced by dpkg-ruby (= 3.7.7). Hi Ryan! Shouldn't it be ruby-dpkg, rather than dpkg-ruby, according to the new Ruby Debian package

Bug#639972: apt-listbugs: Depends on a few of transitional packages

2011-09-03 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 02/09/11 at 19:24 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 11:31:24 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote: On 01.09.11 Francesco Poli (invernom...@paranoici.org) wrote: On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:35:04 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote: Hi, dep: libhttpclient-ruby1.8 (= 2.1.5.2-1)

Bug#639972: apt-listbugs: Depends on a few of transitional packages

2011-09-03 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sat, 3 Sep 2011 22:32:19 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: [...] Hi, Hi Lucas, thanks a lot for your kind reply! Do you know why those versioned deps were introduced? Well, actually, after digging into the git repository, I remembered that the versioned dependency was introduced by me for a

Bug#639972: apt-listbugs: Depends on a few of transitional packages

2011-09-02 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 01.09.11 Francesco Poli (invernom...@paranoici.org) wrote: On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:35:04 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote: Hi, dep: libhttpclient-ruby1.8 (= 2.1.5.2-1) Transitional package for ruby-httpclient also a virtual package provided by ruby-httpclient Should I keep the

Bug#639972: apt-listbugs: Depends on a few of transitional packages

2011-09-02 Thread Francesco Poli
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 11:31:24 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote: On 01.09.11 Francesco Poli (invernom...@paranoici.org) wrote: On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:35:04 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote: Hi, dep: libhttpclient-ruby1.8 (= 2.1.5.2-1) Transitional package for ruby-httpclient also a

Bug#639972: apt-listbugs: Depends on a few of transitional packages

2011-09-01 Thread Hilmar Preusse
Package: apt-listbugs Version: 0.1.5 Severity: important Dear Maintainers, I just noticed that apt-listbugs depends on a few transitional packages. Please consider to correct these and to replace them by the correct depends: dep: libhttpclient-ruby1.8 (= 2.1.5.2-1) Transitional package for

Bug#639972: apt-listbugs: Depends on a few of transitional packages

2011-09-01 Thread Francesco Poli
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:35:04 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote: Package: apt-listbugs Version: 0.1.5 Severity: important Dear Maintainers, I just noticed that apt-listbugs depends on a few transitional packages. Please consider to correct these and to replace them by the correct depends: Dear