Bug#640745: linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64: ecryptfs-migrate-home -u user fails

2011-09-09 Thread Daniel Baumann
retitle 640745 please automatically load ecryptfs kernel module tag 640745 wontfix thanks just because other packages are doing stupid things like adding an initscript for loading a module doesn't mean we should do that everywhere, especially since people are trying to get the startup cleaned

Bug#640745: linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64: ecryptfs-migrate-home -u user fails

2011-09-06 Thread Brian Churchwell
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 3.0.0-3 Severity: normal root@X220-2:/home/brian# ecryptfs-migrate-home -u user INFO: Checking disk space, this may take a few moments. Please be patient. INFO: Checking for open files in /home/user ERROR: Cannot get ecryptfs version, ecryptfs kernel module not

Bug#640745: linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64: ecryptfs-migrate-home -u user fails

2011-09-06 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 17:14 -0700, Brian Churchwell wrote: Package: linux-2.6 Version: 3.0.0-3 Severity: normal root@X220-2:/home/brian# ecryptfs-migrate-home -u user INFO: Checking disk space, this may take a few moments. Please be patient. INFO: Checking for open files in /home/user

Bug#640745: linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64: ecryptfs-migrate-home -u user fails

2011-09-06 Thread Brian Churchwell
On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 01:24 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: We've always built ecryptfs as a module, and I don't see why we should change that. Ben. I was enlightened by http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590081 Now that I understand that this is expected behavior on

Bug#640745: linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64: ecryptfs-migrate-home -u user fails

2011-09-06 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 19:59 -0700, Brian Churchwell wrote: On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 01:24 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: We've always built ecryptfs as a module, and I don't see why we should change that. Ben. I was enlightened by