Bug#641542: paraview: Please use xdmf2 package rather than internal versionof xdmf

2012-01-06 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Alastair, it seems, there are different versions of xdmf (or fork), if I correctly understood from this thread [1]. Biddiscombe, John A. "...the vtkXdmfReader in paraview would need to be rewritten to use the new Xdmf API..." [1] http://www.paraview.org/pipermail/paraview/2

Bug#641542: paraview: Please use xdmf2 package rather than internal versionof xdmf

2011-09-14 Thread Alastair McKinstry
Package: paraview Severity: normal Xdmf2 is shipped with paraview sources, but is also used in the VisIt software (which is being packaged), so I have packaged it as xdmf and it is now available (version 2.1) in debian unstable. Please use this version rather than the internal xdmf. Thanks Ala