Hi René,
Sorry for not getting back to you sooner!
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 10:32:17 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 01:10:29AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:10:13AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > > mingw-w64, which is intended to eventually replace
tag 642954 + pending
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 01:10:29AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:10:13AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > mingw-w64, which is intended to eventually replace mingw32 and the
>
> Why is it then cllaed w*64*? And why didn't it replace them yet?
> So
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:10:13AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> mingw-w64, which is intended to eventually replace mingw32 and the
> assorted packages, is now available in Debian along with new builds of
^^^
> binutils and gcc. To build libreoffice using mingw-w64, all that'
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:10:13AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> mingw-w64, which is intended to eventually replace mingw32 and the
Why is it then cllaed w*64*? And why didn't it replace them yet?
Sound like either a broken package name or wishful thinking to me -
or even both,
> I've rebuilt libr
Package: src:libreoffice
Version: 1:3.4.3-1
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
mingw-w64, which is intended to eventually replace mingw32 and the
assorted packages, is now available in Debian along with new builds of
binutils and gcc. To build libreoffice using mingw-w64, all that's
needed is to
5 matches
Mail list logo
