Bug#643997: aptitude: user-requested downgrade should not cause (so much of a) downgrade penalty for conflict resolution

2015-12-09 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
2015-12-07 21:40 ydir...@free.fr: 2011-10-01 15:59 Yann Dirson: >Package: aptitude >Version: 0.6.3-4 >Severity: normal > >The "downgrade" use-case surely needs some love those days thanks to >the moz foundation: I rapidly had a test of iceweasel 7 in unstable >(eager to get better ram usage ;), j

Bug#643997: aptitude: user-requested downgrade should not cause (so much of a) downgrade penalty for conflict resolution

2015-12-09 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
2015-12-07 16:50 ydir...@free.fr: Are you using R and A to accept or reject individual package solutions? That should help in this case, to avoid repeatedly getting suggestions that you don't want to accept. Yes I do. But I still have to individually refuse all "upgrade" and "keep" suggesti

Bug#643997: aptitude: user-requested downgrade should not cause (so much of a) downgrade penalty for conflict resolution

2015-12-07 Thread ydirson
> 2011-10-01 15:59 Yann Dirson: > >Package: aptitude > >Version: 0.6.3-4 > >Severity: normal > > > >The "downgrade" use-case surely needs some love those days thanks to > >the moz foundation: I rapidly had a test of iceweasel 7 in unstable > >(eager to get better ram usage ;), just to conclude that

Bug#643997: aptitude: user-requested downgrade should not cause (so much of a) downgrade penalty for conflict resolution

2015-12-07 Thread ydirson
- Mail original - > De: "Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo" > À: "Yann Dirson" > Cc: 643...@bugs.debian.org > Envoyé: Lundi 7 Décembre 2015 17:30:46 > Objet: Re: aptitude: user-requested downgrade should not cause (so much of a) > downgrade penalty for conflict > resolution > > 2015-12-07

Bug#643997: aptitude: user-requested downgrade should not cause (so much of a) downgrade penalty for conflict resolution

2015-12-07 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
2015-12-07 15:17 GMT+00:00 : > Hi Manuel, > > - Mail original - >> >The "downgrade" use-case surely needs some love those days thanks to >> >the moz foundation: I rapidly had a test of iceweasel 7 in unstable >> >(eager to get better ram usage ;), just to conclude that so many >> >extensio

Bug#643997: aptitude: user-requested downgrade should not cause (so much of a) downgrade penalty for conflict resolution

2015-12-07 Thread ydirson
Hi Manuel, - Mail original - > >The "downgrade" use-case surely needs some love those days thanks to > >the moz foundation: I rapidly had a test of iceweasel 7 in unstable > >(eager to get better ram usage ;), just to conclude that so many > >extensions are not compatible. > > > >So let's

Bug#643997: aptitude: user-requested downgrade should not cause (so much of a) downgrade penalty for conflict resolution

2015-12-07 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
Control: severity -1 wishlist Control: tags -1 + wontfix Control: close -1 Hi Yann, 2011-10-01 15:59 Yann Dirson: Package: aptitude Version: 0.6.3-4 Severity: normal The "downgrade" use-case surely needs some love those days thanks to the moz foundation: I rapidly had a test of iceweasel 7 in

Bug#643997: aptitude: user-requested downgrade should not cause (so much of a) downgrade penalty for conflict resolution

2011-10-01 Thread Yann Dirson
Package: aptitude Version: 0.6.3-4 Severity: normal The "downgrade" use-case surely needs some love those days thanks to the moz foundation: I rapidly had a test of iceweasel 7 in unstable (eager to get better ram usage ;), just to conclude that so many extensions are not compatible. So let's try