On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 12:06:05PM +0100, Julien Valroff wrote:
Have you been able to test the various commands suggested by Stevan?
Without answer from you, I will downgrade the severity of this bug.
Dear Julien,
I am sorry, but I have not. Unfortunately the issues I was encountering were
too
Hi Stevan,
Le dimanche 01 avril 2012 à 13:25:19 (+0200 CEST), Stevan Bajić a écrit :
[...]
@Julien: Can you close this issue?
I've lowered the severity of the bug, but will close it if there is no new
input within the next months or so.
Cheers,
Julien
--
.''`. Julien Valroff ~
Am 2012-04-01 12:13, schrieb Laurence Withers:
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 12:06:05PM +0100, Julien Valroff wrote:
Have you been able to test the various commands suggested by Stevan?
Without answer from you, I will downgrade the severity of this bug.
Dear Julien,
Hello Laurence,
I am sorry,
Le mardi 1 novembre 2011 21:57:04, Stevan Bajić a écrit :
[SNIP]
Looking now more closer to the original message you wrote I realize
that the message got truncated before the dot. Usually that kind of
stuff happens if the dot is the first character and it is not properly
escaped (dot
Hi Laurence,
Le mardi 01 nov. 2011 à 21:57:04 (+0100 CET), Stevan Bajić a écrit :
[...]
Can you try to (keep in mind that the message will show up on the
original date (aka 05.10.2011) in your inbox):
cat /path/to/the/raw/message/you/sent/me | sendmail -oi l...@lwithers.me.uk
Do you still
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 08:46:04AM +0200, Stevan Bajić wrote:
Do you have the original mail (the 6Kb version) somewhere? In raw
format? Can you send it to me or post a link to it or attach it to
this bug report?
Dear Stevan,
I have finally managed to track down a raw copy of the mail, which I
On 01.11.2011 20:57, Laurence Withers wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 08:46:04AM +0200, Stevan Bajić wrote:
Do you have the original mail (the 6Kb version) somewhere? In raw
format? Can you send it to me or post a link to it or attach it to
this bug report?
Dear Stevan,
Hello Laurence,
I
Hello Laurence and Julien,
2011-10-05 01:58:48 1RBGky-0007w4-3k =
linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org H=mail2.jellyfishnet.co.uk
[93.91.20.10] P=esmtps X=TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_MD5:16 S=6021
id=2a3dcf3da181ad40bde86a3150b27b6b03b4fb3...@dbde02.ent.ti.com
2011-10-05 01:58:48 1RBGky-0007wE-9z =
Package: dspam
Version: 3.10.1+dfs
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
I have discovered that dspam is truncating inbound email after it has been
scanned. Please consider the size field (S=) in the following exim log
entries:
2011-10-05 01:58:48 1RBGky-0007w4-3k =
Hi Laurence,
Le mercredi 05 oct. 2011 à 14:49:24 (+0200 CEST), Laurence Withers a écrit :
Package: dspam
Version: 3.10.1+dfs
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
I have discovered that dspam is truncating inbound email after it has been
scanned. Please consider the
Hi Julien,
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 06:36:26PM +0200, Julien Valroff wrote:
You use the backport, am I right?
I believe so; Squeeze backports are enabled. There was a dspam update
maybe a couple of weeks ago or so.
Would you please describe your setup? Do you use DSPAM in daemon mode?
Sure. I
11 matches
Mail list logo