On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
[-openoffice dropped from Cc, added Andreas]
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 17:51 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
In the mean time I've applied the following change to the release notes:
Author: jcristau
On Friday, 19. April 2013 17:51:36 Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 18:17:00 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
I have done very few tests, but it seems like bringing
openoffice.org-core back (as a transitional package) is the simplest
workaround. If I remember right all
[-openoffice dropped from Cc, added Andreas]
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 17:51 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
In the mean time I've applied the following change to the release notes:
Author: jcristau jcristau@313b444b-1b9f-4f58-a734-7bb04f332e8d
Date: Fri Apr 19 15:47:54 2013 +
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 18:17:00 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 18:17:46 +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
Pictures^Wdpkg-status files or it didn't happen, as I said multiple times
now.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 18:17:46 +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
Pictures^Wdpkg-status files or it didn't happen, as I said multiple times
now.
You'll find the (compressed) status file attached.
[…]
E: Could not
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 06:17:00PM +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
I have done very few tests, but it seems like bringing openoffice.org-core
back (as a transitional package) is the simplest workaround. If I remember
right all status-files I have seen so far about this issue (not that
(breaking my promise, but as it is marked as a release-blocker now)
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 19:59:58 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
Fwiw, I can no longer reproduce this myself.
I've done some recent test dist-upgrades from
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 18:17:46 +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
Pictures^Wdpkg-status files or it didn't happen, as I said multiple times now.
Yeah I know I'll try to get that.
The problem is that there is no this bug as this message is kinda catch-all,
so its extremely likely that
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 645713 wheezy-is-blocker
kthxbye
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 03:46:38 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Package: apt
Version: 0.8.15.9
Severity: normal
Hi,
I tried to run a test dist-upgrade today from squeeze to sid, for a
default GNOME
Am 21.03.2013 19:52, schrieb Julien Cristau:
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 645713 wheezy-is-blocker
kthxbye
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 03:46:38 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Package: apt
Version: 0.8.15.9
Severity: normal
Hi,
I tried to run a test dist-upgrade today
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 19:59:58 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
Fwiw, I can no longer reproduce this myself.
I've done some recent test dist-upgrades from a default squeeze GNOME
installation to wheezy, which worked fine.
From my POV, this bug can be closed.
From mine it can't, because I've
Am 21.03.2013 20:09, schrieb Julien Cristau:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 19:59:58 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
Fwiw, I can no longer reproduce this myself.
I've done some recent test dist-upgrades from a default squeeze GNOME
installation to wheezy, which worked fine.
From my POV, this bug can
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 22:21:29 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
That said, I can no longer really contribute to this bug as I'm not able
to reproduce. Anyone experiencing this problem should probably make a
copy of /var/lib/dpkg/status so we/David can have a look.
Yeah, I made one IIRC, just
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:28:01PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 22:21:29 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
That said, I can no longer really contribute to this bug as I'm not able
to reproduce. Anyone experiencing this problem should probably make a
copy of
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 22:56:49 +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:28:01PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 22:21:29 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
That said, I can no longer really contribute to this bug as I'm not able
to reproduce. Anyone
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:06:19PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 22:56:49 +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:28:01PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 22:21:29 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
That said, I can no longer
Since I can no longer reproduce the exact same issue, i.e. apt bailing
out on 'libgstreamer0.10-0', feel free to close the bug.
That said, I still think apt has issues with breaks and packages which
need to be upgraded in lock-step. See for example [1].
While we worked around [1] by dropping a
Hi,
Michael Biebl wrote (12 Jan 2013 18:04:49 GMT) :
Since I can no longer reproduce the exact same issue, i.e. apt bailing
out on 'libgstreamer0.10-0', feel free to close the bug.
It looks like this Jenkins job still reproduces this problem:
On 2012-02-02 12:38, David Kalnischkies wrote:
Recommends have to be disabled before installing gnome to see this.
(Which, as we all know, is not the default for releases, yet alone years…
so i wonder why piuparts still insist on doing (only) non-default tests,
but that is a completely
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 02:55, Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de wrote:
The actions performed by piuparts are:
bootstrap-minimal-squeeze
apt-get install gnome
switch-sources-list-to-wheezy
apt-get update
apt-get -yf dist-upgrade
Next time, the most important part of the reproducing
Package: apt
Version: 0.8.15.9
Severity: normal
Hi,
I tried to run a test dist-upgrade today from squeeze to sid, for a
default GNOME desktop installation, as I wanted to test the upgrade path
for GNOME 2 → GNOME 3.
Unfortunately, apt aborts with the following error:
E: Could not perform
21 matches
Mail list logo
