On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:52:36AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
retitle 645974 debbugs: add missing References headers to semi-unbreak
threading
thanks
On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 19:40 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
I can add the References header, but I-R-T has a different meaning, so
I shouldn't
On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 03:27 +0200, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
How about adding a Reply link per followup?
Something like:
mailto:xxx...@bugs.debian.org?cc=xx_...@bugs.debian.org
I think you are looking for this bug instead:
https://bugs.debian.org/721131
--
bye,
pabs
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 03:27 +0200, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
How about adding a Reply link per followup?
Something like:
mailto:xxx...@bugs.debian.org?cc=xx_...@bugs.debian.org
I think you are looking for this bug
Package: debbugs
Severity: wishlist
When people mail the bug directly without replying to an existing mail,
it might be nice to add the missing In-Reply-To and References headers
to unbreak threading for those people receiving mail from the BTS.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, Paul Wise wrote:
When people mail the bug directly without replying to an existing mail,
it might be nice to add the missing In-Reply-To and References headers
to unbreak threading for those people receiving mail from the BTS.
I can add the References header, but I-R-T
retitle 645974 debbugs: add missing References headers to semi-unbreak threading
thanks
On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 19:40 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
I can add the References header, but I-R-T has a different meaning, so
I shouldn't add that. [I don't know which message it's a reply to,
only that
6 matches
Mail list logo
