Hi Romain!
I am collaborating to a project who makes extensive use of cwiid. We
are having several issues due to the obsolescence of svn-based cwiid
compared to the github fork, and all of them could be fixed updating
the package. Since the original reporter of this bug doesn't seemed
interested
Hi,
2011/10/23 Erik Saule esa...@bmi.osu.edu:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 02:04:09AM +0200, Romain Beauxis wrote:
2011/10/23 Erik Saule esa...@bmi.osu.edu:
Dear debian developpers,
Hi Erik,
Should Debian really keep on using the svn of cwiid as upstream? The
developement of cwiid is mainly
Package: libcwiid1
Version: 0.6.00+svn201-2+b2
Severity: wishlist
Dear debian developpers,
Should Debian really keep on using the svn of cwiid as upstream? The
developement of cwiid is mainly done on github[1] these days according
to the main devleopper[2].
Actually, the bug reported in [3] is
2011/10/23 Erik Saule esa...@bmi.osu.edu:
Dear debian developpers,
Hi Erik,
Should Debian really keep on using the svn of cwiid as upstream? The
developement of cwiid is mainly done on github[1] these days according
to the main devleopper[2].
Actually, the bug reported in [3] is already
4 matches
Mail list logo
