tags 648012 + fixed-upstream
quit
On 2011-11-09 14:54, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Sure thing. Here it is. (I just redid the patch, but hopefully it's
the same.)
Thanks! Applied all of them (added one missing '' to a third one).
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID:
Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
Thanks! Applied all of them (added one missing '' to a third one).
Thanks for your attention to detail. :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tags 648012 + confirmed
quit
Hi,
Thanks to the reporter, indeed sounds reasonable.
Thanks, Jonathan, the patch looks good. I wonder if it would be easy for
you to rebase it against the 'next' branch (it's fine if you don't want).
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID:
tags 648012 + patch
quit
Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
Thanks, Jonathan, the patch looks good. I wonder if it would be easy for
you to rebase it against the 'next' branch (it's fine if you don't want).
Sure thing. Here it is. (I just redid the patch, but hopefully it's
the same.)
From
Package: cupt
Version: 2.2.2
Severity: wishlist
Since on startup, 'cupt' checks for '/etc/cupt/cupt.conf':
% cupt config-dump | egrep '.*cupt::directory::configuration.*'
cupt::directory::configuration etc/cupt;
cupt::directory::configuration::main cupt.conf;
Hi,
A. Costa wrote:
Please consider moving the 'man cupt' text under CONFIGURATION VARIABLES
to its own man page, e.g. 'cupt.conf(5)'.
Sounds reasonable. Here's a first sketch; what do you think?
(As you can see, I'm lazy. Improvements welcome.)
---
debian/install_pods |2 +-
6 matches
Mail list logo
