On jeu., 2011-11-17 at 13:19 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org writes:
I've asked Xfce people about that, and they don't really remember why
-nocpp is passed. Looking a bit on Google, I found
Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org writes:
On jeu., 2011-11-17 at 13:19 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Well, hopefully one would only use the default behavior when loading
the user's personal configuration (and maybe system-wide defaults),
where cpp is part of the expected interface.
Well, it
On ven., 2011-11-18 at 10:36 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org writes:
On jeu., 2011-11-17 at 13:19 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Well, hopefully one would only use the default behavior when loading
the user's personal configuration (and maybe system-wide
Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org writes:
On ven., 2011-11-18 at 10:36 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
I don't *think* you're likely to run into any backward compatibility
problems by removing -nocpp from Xfce. I can't think of an otherwise
valid .Xresources file that would then break.
I
Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org writes:
I've asked Xfce people about that, and they don't really remember why
-nocpp is passed. Looking a bit on Google, I found
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnomecc-list/2005-October/msg00024.html
and I think the command line was basically copied from
On sam., 2011-11-12 at 13:01 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
I just switched from GNOME to Xfce and discovered that all of my xterms
were using a microfont. It took a bit of tracking down, but this was
because .Xresources wasn't being run through the preprocessor, so the
xterm font was being set
6 matches
Mail list logo
