On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 09:29, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Medhamsh [2011.12.24.0912 +0100]:
>> Thanks! By the way I have started working on this and how
>> do I get a mentor? Should I write to pkg-vim-maintainers?
>
> Again, your plugin should not be a package of its own, but submitted
also sprach Medhamsh [2011.12.24.1003 +0100]:
> > Again, your plugin should not be a package of its own, but submitted
> > as a patch to vim-scripts.
>
> Definitely! Should I now write this to vim-scripts maintainer
> and to the pkg-vim-maintainers list?
I think the best would be to obtain the p
Hi Martin,
On Sat, December 24, 2011 1:59 pm, martin f krafft wrote:
> Again, your plugin should not be a package of its own, but submitted
> as a patch to vim-scripts.
Definitely! Should I now write this to vim-scripts maintainer
and to the pkg-vim-maintainers list?
Sincerely,
--
Medhamsh
Ha
also sprach Medhamsh [2011.12.24.0912 +0100]:
> Thanks! By the way I have started working on this and how
> do I get a mentor? Should I write to pkg-vim-maintainers?
Again, your plugin should not be a package of its own, but submitted
as a patch to vim-scripts.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft
Hi,
On Thu, December 22, 2011 12:42 am, James McCoy wrote:
> No, you don't need to. The intent of the bug (declaring your intent to
> package NERD tree) is still valid. These are just comments to keep in mind
> as you prepare the packaging.
Thanks! By the way I have started working on this an
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:42:02PM +0530, Medhamsh wrote:
> Should I close this bug and resubmit with
> proper information?
No, you don't need to. The intent of the bug (declaring your intent to
package NERD tree) is still valid. These are just comments to keep in
mind as you prepare the packagi
Hi,
Should I close this bug and resubmit with
proper information?
Thanks,
--
Medhamsh
On Wed, December 21, 2011 10:49 pm, James McCoy wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 07:24:58PM +0530, medhamsh wrote:
>
>> * Package name: nerdtree
>>
>
> The binary package should be vim-nerdtree.
>
>
>> Vers
Hi,
On Wed, December 21, 2011 9:36 pm, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Bug reassigned from package 'nerdtree' to 'wnpp'.
Thanks for correcting me. This is my first ITP bug.
> Please contact me if you need assistance.
What is my next step in this Debian BTS. Should I resubmit
something? Or
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 07:24:58PM +0530, medhamsh wrote:
> * Package name: nerdtree
The binary package should be vim-nerdtree.
> Version : 4.1.0
> Upstream Author : Marty Grenfell
> * URL : http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=1658
> * License : (P
reassign 652891 wnpp
thanks
medhamsh writes:
> Package: nerdtree
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: medhamsh
When filing ITP bugs, please file it against the wnpp virtual package,
as explained here: http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/#l2
> * Package name: nerdtree
> Version : 4.1.0
>
also sprach medhamsh [2011.12.21.1454 +0100]:
> Package: nerdtree
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: medhamsh
>
>
> * Package name: nerdtree
> Version : 4.1.0
> Upstream Author : Marty Grenfell
> * URL : http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=1658
> * License
Package: nerdtree
Severity: wishlist
Owner: medhamsh
* Package name: nerdtree
Version : 4.1.0
Upstream Author : Marty Grenfell
* URL : http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=1658
* License : (Public Domain)
Programming Lang: (Ruby)
Description
12 matches
Mail list logo
