On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 10:04:32PM -0800, Ryan Niebur wrote:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 04:44:31AM +0200, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
The package in its current version works for me. However, I believe it
is unsuitable for a release (and hence inclusion in testing) as it's
clearly lacking a
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 05:01:52PM +0200, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 10:04:32PM -0800, Ryan Niebur wrote:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 04:44:31AM +0200, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
The package in its current version works for me. However, I believe it
is unsuitable for a
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 05:15:54PM +0100, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 05:01:52PM +0200, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 10:04:32PM -0800, Ryan Niebur wrote:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 04:44:31AM +0200, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
The package in its current
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 10:04:32PM -0800, Ryan Niebur wrote:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 04:44:31AM +0200, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
The package in its current version works for me. However, I believe it
is unsuitable for a release (and hence inclusion in testing) as it's
clearly lacking a
Package: thin
Version: 1.2.4-1.1
Severity: serious
Hi,
I noticed that the package thin hasn't been maintained properly.
It hasn't had a maintainer upload since September 2009 when 1.2.4-1 was
uploaded; during that time, upstream released 1.2.6 (Feb 2010), 1.2.7
(March 2010), 1.2.8 (February
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 04:44:31AM +0200, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
The package in its current version works for me. However, I believe it
is unsuitable for a release (and hence inclusion in testing) as it's
clearly lacking a maintainer. I'd suggest either to start working on it,
or O/RFH it.
6 matches
Mail list logo
