On 2012-01-11 03:31, Sitaram Chamarty wrote:
| On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net wrote:
| retitle 653968 [PATCH] gitolite: gl-setup doesn't warn it opens another
editor (Emacs M-x shell)
| forwarded 653968 Sitaram Chamarty sitar...@gmail.com
| thanks
|
|
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:59 PM, jaalto jari.aa...@cante.net wrote:
On 2012-01-11 03:31, Sitaram Chamarty wrote:
| On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net wrote:
| retitle 653968 [PATCH] gitolite: gl-setup doesn't warn it opens another
editor (Emacs M-x shell)
|
On 2012-01-11 14:03, Sitaram Chamarty wrote:
| On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:59 PM, jaalto jari.aa...@cante.net wrote:
| On 2012-01-11 03:31, Sitaram Chamarty wrote:
| | http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653968
| |
| | Sorry but this does not make any sense to me.
|
| The
sigh
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:36 PM, jaalto jari.aa...@cante.net wrote:
The current code makes assumptions about environment that are not
necessarily true.
Please just $EDITOR to whatever you want; vi is not the default; it's
the fallback if $EDITOR is not set.
I didn't invent $EDITOR; it's
On 2012-01-11 14:43, Sitaram Chamarty wrote:
| The current code makes assumptions about environment that are not
| necessarily true.
|
| Please just $EDITOR to whatever you want; vi is not the default; it's
| the fallback if $EDITOR is not set.
|
| I didn't invent $EDITOR; it's apparently some
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:39 PM, jaalto jari.aa...@cante.net wrote:
Using EDITOR is standard thing. But this is not related to discussion
where program makes assumptions about being run under controlling
terminal.
That's the first time you mentioned controlling terminal, i.e., more
generic
On 2012-01-11 16:37, Sitaram Chamarty wrote:
| Please check if 'test -t 0' is sufficient to test this and let me know.
Under Emacs M-x shell:
$ test -t 0 ; echo $?
0
Jari
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 5:30 PM, jaalto jari.aa...@cante.net wrote:
On 2012-01-11 16:37, Sitaram Chamarty wrote:
| Please check if 'test -t 0' is sufficient to test this and let me know.
Under Emacs M-x shell:
$ test -t 0 ; echo $?
0
And I know under a normal shell also it says
On 2012-01-11 17:39, Sitaram Chamarty wrote:
|
| Well, try fd 1, and possibly fd 2 as well I guess. I'll also check
| around for a way to detect not having a controlling terminal.
Here are the results from Emacs M-x shell:
$ for i in 0 1 2 ; do test -t $i ; echo fd $i status: $? ; done
retitle 653968 [PATCH] gitolite: gl-setup doesn't warn it opens another editor
(Emacs M-x shell)
forwarded 653968 Sitaram Chamarty sitar...@gmail.com
thanks
Sitaram, could you apply this patch to fix Debian bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653968
Thanks,
Jari
From
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net wrote:
retitle 653968 [PATCH] gitolite: gl-setup doesn't warn it opens another
editor (Emacs M-x shell)
forwarded 653968 Sitaram Chamarty sitar...@gmail.com
thanks
Sitaram, could you apply this patch to fix Debian bug:
However, I realise now that the -q was not documented. Sorry about
that; the following documentation changes have now been pushed to both
github and googlecode sites:
https://github.com/sitaramc/gitolite/commit/c15ceeb3eb37666435499d3d7dcb144fbaa0990d
(And although I believe an instruction to
12 matches
Mail list logo
