On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 02:50:45PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Le 25/05/2014 14:44, Yves-Alexis Perez a écrit :
> > On dim., 2014-05-25 at 09:19 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> >> The Ubuntu bug claims that the bug was fixed in xfce4-volumed 0.2.
> >> It looks like they forked xfce-volumed?
> >> But
Le 25/05/2014 14:44, Yves-Alexis Perez a écrit :
> On dim., 2014-05-25 at 09:19 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
>> The Ubuntu bug claims that the bug was fixed in xfce4-volumed 0.2.
>> It looks like they forked xfce-volumed?
>> But at least it works perfectly on my machine now.
> So does it work or does
On dim., 2014-05-25 at 09:19 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> The Ubuntu bug claims that the bug was fixed in xfce4-volumed 0.2.
> It looks like they forked xfce-volumed?
> But at least it works perfectly on my machine now.
So does it work or does it not work?
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Descripti
3 matches
Mail list logo