On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 08:51, Craig Sanders c...@taz.net.au wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 12:15:38PM +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
No, i am saying that apt asks for Translation-en and the
server response with Translation-en.bz2. APT knows that
it can't request the bz2 file if bzip2 isn't
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 12:15:38PM +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
No, i am saying that apt asks for Translation-en and the
server response with Translation-en.bz2. APT knows that
it can't request the bz2 file if bzip2 isn't available,
but some mirrors try to be helpful and clever… See also
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 15:35, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud o...@debian.org wrote:
So apt should either:
a) gracefully fallback on short translations when it fails to
uncompress/parse the Translation packages;
b) Bump its Suggests: bzip to a {Pre-}Depends on bzip2 / libbz2-1.0 (if
sufficient) to be
Le 06.03.2012 11:33, David Kalnischkies a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 15:35, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud o...@debian.org wrote:
So apt should either:
a) gracefully fallback on short translations when it fails to
uncompress/parse the Translation packages;
b) Bump its Suggests: bzip to a
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:00, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud o...@debian.org wrote:
Le 06.03.2012 11:33, David Kalnischkies a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 15:35, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud o...@debian.org wrote:
The problem is here that some (yes, neither all nor many) mirrors try
content-
negotiation for
severity 657560 serious
thanks
Le 27.01.2012 22:01, Michael Prokop a écrit :
All of:
#657029 - mirrors: apt-get update does not understand content negotiation
#657560 - apt: ...i18n_Translation-en Encountered a section with no Package:
header
#657563 - aptitude: Fails on bzip2-only
6 matches
Mail list logo
