Bug#658209: DEP-5: Clarifying copyright/license requirements

2012-02-02 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 09:23:08PM +0100, gregor herrmann a écrit : On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:14:11 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: @@ -262,10 +265,15 @@ para The declaration of copyright and license for files is done in one or more paragraphs. In the simplest

Bug#658209: DEP-5: Clarifying copyright/license requirements

2012-02-02 Thread Russ Allbery
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes: Are there other blocking issues with this DEP ? If not, I will mark it accepted after two week-ends. I have some lingering concern that the spec isn't sufficiently clear and precise, and I know Steve was planning on writing up the issues that he saw

Bug#658209: DEP-5: Clarifying copyright/license requirements

2012-02-01 Thread gregor herrmann
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:14:11 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: would the follwing be sufficient in your opinion ? Thank you! --- copyright-format.xml (révision 252) +++ copyright-format.xml (copie de travail) @@ -42,8 +42,11 @@ automatically extract licensing information.

Bug#658209: DEP-5: Clarifying copyright/license requirements

2012-01-31 Thread Charles Plessy
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.9.2.0 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: debian-proj...@lists.debian.org It is needed to underline clearly that the machine-readable format (DEP 5) does not require to document more information than before, is optional, and is not a part of the Debian Policy. (the