Bug#658981: cupt: Packages satisfying alternative Depends are being scheduled for removal

2012-02-10 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
tags 658981 + confirmed quit On 2012-02-08 19:26, James McCoy wrote: On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 03:38:39PM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: | cupt::resolver::not-autoremove-if-rdepends-exist '.*' From a grammatical perspective, that should probably be no instead of not. True, thanks for

Bug#658981: cupt: Packages satisfying alternative Depends are being scheduled for removal

2012-02-08 Thread James McCoy
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 10:46:47AM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: On 2012-02-06 22:01, James McCoy wrote: On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 08:37:47PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: I don't see a bug here. You only need one video DDX package to satisfy the dependency by xserver-xorg, so

Bug#658981: cupt: Packages satisfying alternative Depends are being scheduled for removal

2012-02-08 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
retitle 658981 cupt: implement 'not-autoremove-if-rdepends-exist' package list option severity 658981 wishlist quit On 2012-02-08 06:19, James McCoy wrote: I have four xserver-xorg-video-* packages installed: fbdev, nouveau, intel, and vesa. Only fbdev is marked as automatically installed,

Bug#658981: cupt: Packages satisfying alternative Depends are being scheduled for removal

2012-02-08 Thread James McCoy
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 03:38:39PM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: On 2012-02-08 06:19, James McCoy wrote: I have four xserver-xorg-video-* packages installed: fbdev, nouveau, intel, and vesa. Only fbdev is marked as automatically installed, yet cupt is still trying to remove that

Bug#658981: cupt: Packages satisfying alternative Depends are being scheduled for removal

2012-02-07 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hi James and Jonathan, [ Jonathan, I don't know do you want explicit CCs or not, kept it for now ] On 2012-02-06 22:01, James McCoy wrote: On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 08:37:47PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Since upgrading to 2.4.0, various packages are suddenly showing up as to be removed.

Bug#658981: cupt: Packages satisfying alternative Depends are being scheduled for removal

2012-02-07 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: I see three ways to resolve this bug: 0) Reaffirm that unmarkauto command should be used whenever user wants to say this was automatically installed initially, but now I want to keep it. Close the bug as not a bug. 1) Agree that some users want less aggressive

Bug#658981: cupt: Packages satisfying alternative Depends are being scheduled for removal

2012-02-07 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
On 2012-02-07 03:09, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: [...] 2) Further discussion. For example, more arguments why new behavior may be unnacceptable as a default, or implementing more fine-grained setup to specify user-level dependencies like

Bug#658981: cupt: Packages satisfying alternative Depends are being scheduled for removal

2012-02-06 Thread James McCoy
Package: cupt Version: 2.4.0 Severity: important Since upgrading to 2.4.0, various packages are suddenly showing up as to be removed. As far as I can tell, this is only happening when those packages are satisfying an ORed relationship. $ sudo cupt satisfy Building the package cache...

Bug#658981: cupt: Packages satisfying alternative Depends are being scheduled for removal

2012-02-06 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi James, James McCoy wrote: Since upgrading to 2.4.0, various packages are suddenly showing up as to be removed. As far as I can tell, this is only happening when those packages are satisfying an ORed relationship. [...] The following packages will be removed: [...]

Bug#658981: cupt: Packages satisfying alternative Depends are being scheduled for removal

2012-02-06 Thread James McCoy
severity 658981 normal thanks On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 08:37:47PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Since upgrading to 2.4.0, various packages are suddenly showing up as to be removed. As far as I can tell, this is only happening when those packages are satisfying an ORed relationship. [...]