Control: notfound -1 1:1.12.13-12+squeeze1
On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 17:16:47 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
Control: fixed -1 1:1.12.13-12+squeeze1
It's closed, but marked as still affecting the version in stable.
I think the above should fix that.
Nope, I guess this one should do, though:
Control: fixed -1 1:1.12.13-12+squeeze1
On Sun, 2013-03-31 at 14:15:33 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Adam D. Barratt dixit:
I don't think you can (in either case). You can mark a bug as found / fixed
in
a binary version, but the BTS will translate that to the corresponding
source
On 31.03.2013 00:17, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Adam D. Barratt dixit:
In which case it should probably be closed, as it doesn't apply to
any current
package in the archive and no changes in the package are required to
resolve
it.
OK.
Hrm. How do I tell the BTS’ version tracking that it’s
Adam D. Barratt dixit:
I don't think you can (in either case). You can mark a bug as found / fixed in
a binary version, but the BTS will translate that to the corresponding source
version. Similarly bug versions apply to the package, not to particular
architectures.
Hrm.
I think the
On 30.03.2013 17:03, ow...@bugs.debian.org wrote:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 659861 + squeeze-ignore
Bug #659861 [cvs] cvs contains /usr/share/info/dir.gz
Bug #664872 [cvs] cvs: Excess dir.gz file in /usr/share/info
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
Added tag(s)
Adam D. Barratt dixit:
tags 659861 + squeeze-ignore
Apologies if I missed the discussion, but was that agreed with anyone on the
release team?
It’s just not a bug in the package but a bug in the build environment
of the person who did the last upload (which was subsequently fixed
by a binNMU
Control: tags -1 - squeeze-ignore
On 30.03.2013 22:59, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Adam D. Barratt dixit:
tags 659861 + squeeze-ignore
Apologies if I missed the discussion, but was that agreed with
anyone on the
release team?
It’s just not a bug in the package but a bug in the build
Adam D. Barratt dixit:
In which case it should probably be closed, as it doesn't apply to any current
package in the archive and no changes in the package are required to resolve
it.
OK.
Hrm. How do I tell the BTS’ version tracking that it’s fixed in
1:1.12.13-12+squeeze1+b1 on amd64 and not
8 matches
Mail list logo