Package: libhdf5-serial-dev
Version: 1.8.8-9
Followup-For: Bug #660547
To remove a package feature, just because it's not used by any other Debian
package appears rather strange to me.
I'm developing an application that uses the HDF5 C++ API, thus your
change just broke my development machine.
On 20/04/2012 10:02, Tolga Dalman wrote:
Package: libhdf5-serial-dev
Version: 1.8.8-9
Followup-For: Bug #660547
To remove a package feature, just because it's not used by any other Debian
package appears rather strange to me.
The main reason was that it was a pain to manage symbol files with a
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 07:26:51PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 09:24:58PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 09:34:20AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
First because having more than one shared lib per binary package is a
recipe for
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 07:24:19PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
Second, the c++ libs were only built
with the serial libhdf5 variant, not with any of the mpi ones;
Yes, that's why I specified to produce C++ libs for all variants.
As explained, in this specific case it cannot be done
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 20:10:17 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:01:12PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
I guess the best would be to reintroduce them but as part of a separate
libhdf5-cpp-7 binary package (the reason I dropped them was that they
were in libhdf5-7
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 09:34:20AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 20:10:17 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:01:12PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
I guess the best would be to reintroduce them but as part of a separate
libhdf5-cpp-7 binary
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 09:24:58PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 09:34:20AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
First because having more than one shared lib per binary package is a
recipe for trouble down the road. Second, the c++ libs were only built
with the
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 21:31:22 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 09:37:49PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 13:40:03 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
Package: hdf5
Version: 1.8.8-7.1
Severity: normal
hdf5 (1.8.8-7.1) unstable;
Le mardi 21 février 2012 à 15:01 +0100, Julien Cristau a écrit :
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 21:31:22 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 09:37:49PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 13:40:03 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
Package: hdf5
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:01:12PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
I guess the best would be to reintroduce them but as part of a separate
libhdf5-cpp-7 binary package (the reason I dropped them was that they
were in libhdf5-7 but not in the mpi variants, which meant the mpi
variants didn't
Package: hdf5
Version: 1.8.8-7.1
Severity: normal
hdf5 (1.8.8-7.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Stop building the c++ libraries, nothing uses them.
That's not true. I need C++ libraries for ITK. Please re-enable.
Thanks,
-Steve
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 13:40:03 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
Package: hdf5
Version: 1.8.8-7.1
Severity: normal
hdf5 (1.8.8-7.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Stop building the c++ libraries, nothing uses them.
That's not true. I need C++ libraries for ITK. Please re-enable.
hmm, I
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 09:37:49PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 13:40:03 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
Package: hdf5
Version: 1.8.8-7.1
Severity: normal
hdf5 (1.8.8-7.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Stop building the c++ libraries, nothing uses them.
13 matches
Mail list logo
