control: reassign -1 insserv control: tags -1 +moreinfo
> update-rc.d: using dependency based boot sequencing > insserv: script vsftpd is not an executable regular file, skipped! > > However vsftpd was not skipped --- the "update-rc.d vsftpd disable" > command behaves exactly the way I'd have wanted, even after the init > script is marked executable again. > > What is this message intended to convey? Could it be reworded? > > The non-executable script gets ignored, then later when insserv updates the > symlink farm based on the overall dependency graph (which doesn't include the > skipped script), symlinks to scripts which do not exist or are invalid are > removed. > Ok, so that is what the message wants to say. How about: > insserv: script vsftpd is not executable, will be skipped in boot sequence! > insserv: script vsftpd is not a regular file, will be skipped in boot > sequence! Jesse, what do you think about proposed rewording? If you agree, please tag as +fixed-upstream, otherwise tag as +wontfix and close. Thank you.
