Package: xfsprogs
Version: 3.1.7
Followup-For: Bug #661580
Hi again,
I've patched the NBD driver to set the physical sector size. Was way
easier than I imagined:
--
--- linux/drivers/block/nbd.c~ 2012-03-01
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 09:14:09AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
And I can confirm that the sector size detection is still broken in
3.1.7.
That's a known bug that Carlos wanted to look into. If you really can't
accept smaller I/O without major pain make sure to use a larger logical
Christoph Hellwig h...@infradead.org writes:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 04:53:32AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
I'm asuming libblkid is used, otherwise a sectorsize of 512 would make
no sense.
It might be that NBD advertises the geometry wrong, as in ft.sectorsize
isn't set correctly.
Christoph Hellwig h...@infradead.org writes:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 09:14:09AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
And I can confirm that the sector size detection is still broken in
3.1.7.
That's a known bug that Carlos wanted to look into. If you really can't
accept smaller I/O without
On 3/1/12 2:33 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 09:14:09AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
And I can confirm that the sector size detection is still broken in
3.1.7.
That's a known bug that Carlos wanted to look into. If you really can't
accept smaller I/O without
I've pushed a commit which should fix this, assuming xfsprogs is built with
libblkid support enabled:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=fs/xfs/xfsprogs-dev.git;a=commitdiff;h=287d168b550857ce40e04b5f618d7eb91b87022f
-Eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On 2/28/12 3:11 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Carlos, didn't you plan to look into this issue?
Goswin, how do you determin that mkfs is still doing unaligned I/O
when forcing the large sevtor size? Once we set the sector size XFS
can't do I/O smaller than it.
I did think this was supposed
Eric Sandeen sand...@sandeen.net writes:
On 2/28/12 3:11 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Carlos, didn't you plan to look into this issue?
Goswin, how do you determin that mkfs is still doing unaligned I/O
when forcing the large sevtor size? Once we set the sector size XFS
can't do I/O
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 04:53:32AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
I'm asuming libblkid is used, otherwise a sectorsize of 512 would make
no sense.
It might be that NBD advertises the geometry wrong, as in ft.sectorsize
isn't set correctly. That would make that part at least a kernel bug.
Carlos, didn't you plan to look into this issue?
Goswin, how do you determin that mkfs is still doing unaligned I/O
when forcing the large sevtor size? Once we set the sector size XFS
can't do I/O smaller than it.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 08:49:14AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Package:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 04:11:51AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Carlos, didn't you plan to look into this issue?
Goswin, how do you determin that mkfs is still doing unaligned I/O
when forcing the large sevtor size? Once we set the sector size XFS
can't do I/O smaller than it.
On Tue,
Christoph Hellwig h...@infradead.org writes:
Carlos, didn't you plan to look into this issue?
Goswin, how do you determin that mkfs is still doing unaligned I/O
when forcing the large sevtor size? Once we set the sector size XFS
can't do I/O smaller than it.
I'm writing a nbd-server that
Package: xfsprogs
Version: 3.1.7
Severity: important
File: /sbin/mkfs.xfs
Hi,
since I recently bought a harddisk with 4K sector size I've been
checking for correct alignment and blocksizes in various things. One
of them being xfs.
When I partition the disk in parted it shows correctly to have a
13 matches
Mail list logo
