Bug#661986: SV: Bug#661986: SV: Bug#661986: [INTL:da] Danish translation of win32-loader

2012-03-07 Thread hec...@btinternet.com
Please do not send bug reports --- On 3 Mar 2012 at 19:52, Christian PERRIER wrote: Subject:Bug#661986: SV: Bug#661986: SV: Bug#661986: [INTL:da] Danish translation of win32-loader Send reply to: Christian PERRIER , 661...@bugs.debian.org Forwarded

Bug#661986: SV: Bug#661986: SV: Bug#661986: [INTL:da] Danish translation of win32-loader

2012-03-07 Thread hec...@btinternet.com
Please do not send bug reports --- On 3 Mar 2012 at 12:30, Joe Dalton wrote: Subject:Bug#661986: SV: Bug#661986: SV: Bug#661986: [INTL:da] Danish translation of win32-loader Send reply to: Joe Dalton , 661...@bugs.debian.org Forwarded by: Joe

Bug#661986: SV: Bug#661986: SV: Bug#661986: [INTL:da] Danish translation of win32-loader

2012-03-03 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Joe Dalton (joedalt...@yahoo.dk): > that way we »only« get it wrong then 1 second, 1 minute and 1 hour is used > (most likely the fewest situations). > > I see this as a better solution than the choice in Bokmål (yes they > are very s Yes, I see. Indeed, as leaving an empty string trigg

Bug#661986: SV: Bug#661986: SV: Bug#661986: [INTL:da] Danish translation of win32-loader

2012-03-03 Thread Joe Dalton
.@bugs.debian.org Cc: "debian-l10n-dan...@lists.debian.org" Sendt: 11:40 lørdag den 3. marts 2012 Emne: Re: Bug#661986: SV: Bug#661986: [INTL:da] Danish translation of win32-loader Quoting Joe Dalton (joedalt...@yahoo.dk): > this is very strange, I just checked the proposed change

Bug#661986: SV: Bug#661986: [INTL:da] Danish translation of win32-loader

2012-03-03 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Joe Dalton (joedalt...@yahoo.dk): > this is very strange, I just checked the proposed change > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1656076&group_id=22049&atid=373087, > and it seems to have been accepted, but still this string is still part of > the po-file. Ah, you

Bug#661986: SV: Bug#661986: [INTL:da] Danish translation of win32-loader

2012-03-03 Thread Joe Dalton
this is very strange, I just checked the proposed change http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1656076&group_id=22049&atid=373087, and it seems to have been accepted, but still this string is still part of the po-file. #. translate: #. This string is appended to "second", "m