Bug#663747: [r...@debian.org: Bug#663747: FTBFS with LibreOffice 3.5: basis-link gone/uninstallable with LibreOffice 3.5]

2012-03-13 Thread Martin Kelly
Filing this as important for now but this bug will become serious when LibreOffice 3.5.x gets uploaded to sid (and this *will* happen before the wheezy freeze) I should have time to apply that patch to 2.0-1 within the next week or two; I will do so as soon as I can. [1] and you even

Bug#663747: [r...@debian.org: Bug#663747: FTBFS with LibreOffice 3.5: basis-link gone/uninstallable with LibreOffice 3.5]

2012-03-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 04:45:57PM -0400, Martin Kelly wrote: Filing this as important for now but this bug will become serious when LibreOffice 3.5.x gets uploaded to sid (and this *will* happen before the wheezy freeze) I should have time to apply that patch to 2.0-1 within the

Bug#663747: [r...@debian.org: Bug#663747: FTBFS with LibreOffice 3.5: basis-link gone/uninstallable with LibreOffice 3.5]

2012-03-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 08:05:30PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: diff -u openclipart-0.18+dfsg/debian/control openclipart-0.18+dfsg/debian/control --- openclipart-0.18+dfsg/debian/control +++ openclipart-0.18+dfsg/debian/control @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ Package: openclipart-libreoffice

Bug#663747: [r...@debian.org: Bug#663747: FTBFS with LibreOffice 3.5: basis-link gone/uninstallable with LibreOffice 3.5]

2012-03-13 Thread Martin Kelly
Thanks; I'm merging in the changes you mentioned. However, what should I do about the changelog? If I retroactively add entries, the dates will be out of order (which looks bad). But if I skip versions that exist (-12, -13), that looks bad too. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#663747: [r...@debian.org: Bug#663747: FTBFS with LibreOffice 3.5: basis-link gone/uninstallable with LibreOffice 3.5]

2012-03-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 06:44:17PM -0400, Martin Kelly wrote: Thanks; I'm merging in the changes you mentioned. However, what should I do about the changelog? If I retroactively add entries, the dates will be out of order (which looks bad). But if I skip versions that exist (-12, -13),