Mark Purcell writes:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 21:32:09 Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> I noticed this site:
>>
>> http://www.webrtc.org/ilbc-freeware
>
> Simon,
>
> In 2006 you filed the same bug report:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=393402
>
> Since then we have _not_ shipped ilbc i
On 03/19/12 13:28, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Some even further information, as I seen that others have identified the
> problem, see for example:
>
> http://yate.null.ro/mantis/view.php?id=295
>
> There exists a libilbc library with a clear license here:
>
> https://github.com/dekkers/libilbc
>
Faidon Liambotis writes:
> On 03/19/12 13:28, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> Some even further information, as I seen that others have identified the
>> problem, see for example:
>>
>> http://yate.null.ro/mantis/view.php?id=295
>>
>> There exists a libilbc library with a clear license here:
>>
>>
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 21:32:09 Simon Josefsson wrote:
> I noticed this site:
>
> http://www.webrtc.org/ilbc-freeware
Simon,
In 2006 you filed the same bug report:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=393402
Since then we have _not_ shipped ilbc in Debian, until this year when Google
Some even further information, as I seen that others have identified the
problem, see for example:
http://yate.null.ro/mantis/view.php?id=295
There exists a libilbc library with a clear license here:
https://github.com/dekkers/libilbc
It is labeled as a "drop-in replacement for the non-free co
I noticed this site:
http://www.webrtc.org/ilbc-freeware
However I cannot find any license statement that applies to the iLBC
reference implementation. Maybe you could use the iLBC implementation
from WebRTC instead? It seems quite heavily modified from the reference
implementation though. It
6 matches
Mail list logo
