Bug#666865: Unarchive: The problem still persists

2012-05-25 Thread Arno Töll
Hi, On 25.05.2012 16:31, micah anderson wrote: Shall we close the bug? Fine with me, thanks. -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#666865: Unarchive: The problem still persists

2012-05-25 Thread micah anderson
Arno Töll a...@debian.org writes: Hi, On 24.05.2012 19:12, micah anderson wrote: Do you have a way of testing this? I've set up something that I believe should let the messages through based on the X-Loop header, but need to test that it is working. There was a mistake in what was done,

Bug#666865: Unarchive: The problem still persists

2012-05-24 Thread micah anderson
Arno Töll a...@debian.org writes: Hello, reopening the bug as the problem still persists. Do you have a way of testing this? I've set up something that I believe should let the messages through based on the X-Loop header, but need to test that it is working. micah -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#666865: Unarchive: The problem still persists

2012-05-24 Thread micah anderson
micah anderson mi...@riseup.net writes: Arno Töll a...@debian.org writes: Hello, reopening the bug as the problem still persists. Do you have a way of testing this? I've set up something that I believe should let the messages through based on the X-Loop header, but need to test that it is

Bug#666865: Unarchive: The problem still persists

2012-05-24 Thread Arno Töll
Hi, On 24.05.2012 19:12, micah anderson wrote: Do you have a way of testing this? I've set up something that I believe should let the messages through based on the X-Loop header, but need to test that it is working. There was a mistake in what was done, but that has been fixed now. Well,

Bug#666865: Unarchive: The problem still persists

2012-05-06 Thread Arno Töll
Hi Micah, On 06.05.2012 06:13, micah anderson wrote: What address is not working? I looked around for a canonical list of role addresses that should accept emails, but I couldn't find one, so I gathered as many as I could and added them. Policy says in §3.3: The email address given in the

Bug#666865: Unarchive: The problem still persists

2012-05-06 Thread micah anderson
On Sun, 06 May 2012 12:17:04 +0200, Arno Töll a...@debian.org wrote: Hi Micah, On 06.05.2012 06:13, micah anderson wrote: What address is not working? I looked around for a canonical list of role addresses that should accept emails, but I couldn't find one, so I gathered as many as I

Bug#666865: Unarchive: The problem still persists

2012-05-06 Thread Arno Töll
On 06.05.2012 15:41, micah anderson wrote: I'm afraid I don't understand what that means. How do people contact me through the BTS? If its not through debb...@bugs.debian.org, debb...@busoni.debian.org, nore...@release.debian.org, ow...@bugs.debian.org, or ow...@busoni.debian.org then I do not

Bug#666865: Unarchive: The problem still persists

2012-05-05 Thread Arno Töll
Hello, reopening the bug as the problem still persists. -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#666865: Unarchive: The problem still persists

2012-05-05 Thread micah anderson
On Sat, 05 May 2012 19:04:06 +0200, Arno Töll a...@debian.org wrote: Hello, reopening the bug as the problem still persists. What address is not working? I looked around for a canonical list of role addresses that should accept emails, but I couldn't find one, so I gathered as many as I could